Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36107599›Full record

ArticleMedicine2022

ERAS® protocol improves survival after radical cystectomy: A single-center cohort study.

François Crettenand, Olivier M'Baya, Nuno Grilo, Massimo Valerio, Florence Dartiguenave, Yannick Cerantola, Beat Roth, Jean-Daniel Rouvé, Catherine Blanc, Ilaria Lucca

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

François CrettenandDepartment of Urology, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3784-18290000-0002-3784-1829
Olivier M'BayaDepartment of Urology, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nuno GriloDepartment of Urology, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Massimo ValerioDepartment of Urology, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Florence DartiguenaveDepartment of Urology, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Yannick CerantolaDepartment of Urology, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Beat RothDepartment of Urology, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jean-Daniel RouvéDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Catherine BlancDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ilaria LuccaDepartment of Urology, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo evaluate Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) protocol on oncological outcomes for patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC) for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB).

methodsA prospectively maintained single-institutional database comprising 160 consecutive UCB patients who underwent open RC from 2012 to 2020 was analyzed. Patients receiving chemotherapy and those with a urinary diversion other than ileal conduit were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups according to the perioperative management (ERAS® and pre-ERAS®). The study aimed to evaluate the impact of the ERAS® protocol on survival at five years after surgery using a Kaplan-Meier log-rank test. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify prognostic factors for cancer-specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS).

resultsOf the 107 patients considered for the final analysis, 74 (69%) were included in the ERAS® group. Median follow-up for patients alive at last follow-up was 28 months (interquartile range [IQR] 12-48). Five-years CSS rate was 74% for ERAS® patients, compared to 48% for the control population (P = 0.02), while 5-years OS was 31% higher in the ERAS® (67% vs. 36%, P = .003). In the multivariable analysis, ERAS® protocol and tumor stage were independent factors of CSS, while ERAS®, tumor stage so as total blood loss were independent factors for OS. DISCUSSION: A dedicated ERAS® protocol for UCB patients treated with RC has a significant impact on survival. Reduction of stress after a major surgery and its potential improvement of perioperative patient's immunity may explain these data.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsCohort StudiesCystectomyHumansUrinary Bladder

Identifiers

PMID36107599
PMCPMC9439815
OpenAlexW4294301198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.