SynthesisMedicine2022
A meta-analysis of wenxin granule and metoprolol for the treatment of coronary heart disease and arrhythmia.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis meta-analysis aimed to systematically and comprehensively assess the effectiveness and safety of wenxin granule (WXG) and metoprolol in the treatment of elderly patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and arrhythmia.
methodsWe searched the electronic databases of the Cochrane Library, PUBMED, EMBASE, CNKI, Wangfang, and CBM from initiation to May 1, 2022, and selected a set of clinical indicators for WXG and metoprolol for CHD and arrhythmia. The methodological quality of the included studies was analyzed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Data were pooled using a fixed-effects or random-effects model, and a meta-analysis was conducted.
resultsEight randomized controlled trials involving 722 patients with CHD and arrhythmia were included. Our findings showed that WXG and metoprolol showed better effects than metoprolol alone on electrocardiogram change (odds ratio [OR] = 7.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.48, 35.07]), clinical symptom improvement (OR = 5.83, 95% CI [1.52, 22.35]), overall clinical effect (OR = 5.51, 95% CI [2.65, 11.44], P < .001), atrial premature beat (mean difference [MD] = -109.85, 95% CI [-171.25, -48.46], P < .001), ventricular premature beat (MD = -195.43, 95% CI [-334.09, -56.77], P < .001), borderline premature beat (MD = -42.92, 95% CI [-77.18, -8.67], P = .01), short-burst ventricular tachycardia (MD = -35.98, 95% CI [-39.66, -32.30], P < .001), ST segment reduction (MD = -0.47, 95% CI [-0.54, -0.40], P < .001), ST segment decrease duration (MD = -0.76, 95% CI [-0.95, -0.57], P < .001). However, no significant differences were observed in adverse reactions (OR = 0.54, 95% CI [0.27, 1.09], P = .09).
conclusionCompared to metoprolol alone, WXG and metoprolol can more effectively manage patients with CHD and arrhythmia. However, additional large-scale, multicenter, rigorous, and high-quality randomized controlled trials are warranted to verify the present findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.