Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36107496›Full record

ArticleCancer2022

Oncological and functional outcomes of men undergoing primary whole gland cryoablation of the prostate: A 20-year experience.

Wei Phin Tan, Srinath Kotamarti, Emily Chen, Rachael Mahle, Rohith Arcot, Andrew Chang, Alexandria Ayala, Zoe Michael, Denis Seguier, Thomas J Polascik

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Current Status of Cryoablation in Prostate Cancer Management.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Performance ofPhenomics (Cham, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wei Phin TanDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2651-781X
Srinath KotamartiDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Emily ChenDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Rachael MahleDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Rohith ArcotDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Andrew ChangDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Alexandria AyalaDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7196-442X
Zoe MichaelDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Denis SeguierDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5660-774X
Thomas J PolascikDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University · USMoffitt Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study reports the oncological and functional outcomes in men with localized prostate cancer (Pca) who were treated with primary whole gland cryoablation (WGC) of the prostate.

methodsThe authors retrospectively reviewed their prospectively collected cryosurgery database between January 2002 and September 2019 for men who were treated with WGC of the prostate at a tertiary referral center. Primary outcome includes biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS). Secondary outcomes include failure-free survival (FFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS) and adverse events.

resultsA total of 260 men were included in the study. Men having had prior treatment for Pca were excluded. Median follow-up was 107 months (interquartile range [IQR], 68.3-132.5 months). BRFS, FFS, and MFS at 10 years were 84%, 66%, and 96%, respectively. High risk D'Amico classification was associated with a lower BRFS and FFS on multivariable analysis. No patient had any Pca-related death during follow-up. American Urological Association symptoms score and bother index were unchanged following cryoablation. Median International Index of Erectile Function score precryoablation and post-cryoablation was 7 (IQR, 3-11) and 1 (IQR, 1-5), respectively. Stress urinary incontinence, defined as requiring any protective pads only occurred in five patients (2%). No patient developed a fistula. Grade > 2 Clavien-Dindo adverse events occurred in six (2.3%) patients.

conclusionWGC of the prostate can achieve excellent oncological and functional outcomes in men with localized Pca at the 10-year mark. Primary WGC may be a good option for men who desire to preserve urinary continence and have an excellent oncologic outcome. LAY SUMMARY: Primary whole gland cryoablation is an alternative treatment option to radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy for men with organ-confined prostate cancer. Patients had excellent cancer outcomes 1 years after whole gland cryoablation, and patients with PSA nadir 0.1 ng/ml or lower after treatment were less likely to have disease recurrence.

Indexed as

CryosurgeryProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProstateProstate-Specific AntigenRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeProstate-Specific Antigencryotherapy forlocalized prostate cancerprimary cryoablation of the prostateprostate cancerwhole gland cryoablation

Identifiers

PMID36107496
OpenAlexW4295902537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.