Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36107475›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2022

The Influence of Context on Implementation and Improvement: Protocol for a Mixed Methods, Secondary Analyses Study.

Carole Estabrooks, Yuting Song, Ruth Anderson, Anna Beeber, Whitney Berta, Stephanie Chamberlain, Greta Cummings, Yinfei Duan, Leslie Hayduk, Matthias Hoben and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Organizational Context and Quality Indicators in Nursing Homes: A Microsystem Look.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Carole EstabrooksFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4753-6510
Yuting SongSchool of Nursing, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6597-0567
Ruth AndersonSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6640-644X
Anna BeeberSchool of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5191-7578
Whitney BertaInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9934-8450
Stephanie ChamberlainFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9602-3060
Greta CummingsFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0668-6176
Yinfei DuanFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2720-5359
Leslie HaydukFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3051-0840
Matthias HobenFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3465-315X
Alba IaconiFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0013-6867
Holly LanhamDepartment of Medicine, University of Texas Health Sciences Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2681-0397
Janelle PerezSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1861-4436
Jing WangSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7791-671X
Peter NortonDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8711-1074
University of Alberta · CAUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USJohns Hopkins University · USQingdao University · CNThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCaring for the well-being of older adults is one of the greatest challenges in modern societies. Improving the quality of care and life for older adults and the work lives of their care providers calls for effective knowledge translation of evidence-based best practices.

objectiveThis study's purpose is to contribute to knowledge translation by better understanding the roles of organizational context (workplace environment) and facilitation (process or role) in implementation and improvement success. Our study has 2 goals: (1) to advance knowledge translation science by further developing and testing the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework (which outlines how implementation relies on the interplay of context, facilitation, and evidence) and (2) to advance research by optimizing implementation success via tailoring of modifiable elements of organizational context and facilitation.

methodsThis is secondary analyses of 15 years of longitudinal data from the Translating Research in Elder Care (TREC) program's multiple data sources. This research is ongoing in long-term care (LTC) homes in western Canada. TREC data include the following: 5 waves of survey collection, 2 clinical trials, and regular ongoing outcome data for LTC residents. We will use a sequential exploratory and confirmatory mixed methods design. We will analyze qualitative and quantitative data holdings in an iterative process: (1) comprehensive reanalysis of qualitative data to derive hypotheses, (2) quantitative modeling to test hypotheses, and (3) action cycles to further refine and integrate qualitative and quantitative analyses. The research team includes 4 stakeholder panels: (1) system decision- and policy makers, (2) care home managers, (3) direct care staff, and (4) a citizen engagement group of people living with dementia and family members of LTC residents. A fifth group is our panel of external scientific advisors. Each panel will engage periodically, providing their perspectives on project direction and findings.

resultsThis study is funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Ethics approval was obtained from the University of Alberta (Pro00096541). The results of the secondary analyses are expected by the end of 2023.

conclusionsThe project will advance knowledge translation science by deepening our understanding of the roles of context, the interactions between context and facilitation, and their influence on resident and staff quality outcomes. Importantly, findings will inform understanding of the mechanisms by which context and facilitation affect the success of implementation and offer insights into factors that influence the implementation success of interventions in nursing homes. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/40611.

Indexed as

facilitationimplementation scienceorganizational contextPARIHS frameworkPromoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services

Identifiers

PMID36107475
PMCPMC9523530
OpenAlexW4295905005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.