Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36107465›Full record

ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2023

Carbon footprint of atrial fibrillation catheter ablation.

Geoffroy Ditac, Pierre-Jean Cottinet, Minh Quyen Le, Daniel Grinberg, Josselin Duchateau, Kévin Gardey, Arnaud Dulac, Antoine Delinière, Christelle Haddad, Julie Boussuge-Roze and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Reprocessing of single-use medical devices in cardiology: a systematic literature review of safety and performance characteristics applied to cardiac electrophysiology.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The carbon footprint of surgical operations: a systematic review update.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Controversy: pulsed field ablation is the standard technique for all the candidates for atrial fibrillation ablation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Review
  9. Carbon footprint of diagnostic coronary angiography.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Assessing the environmental impact of coronary artery bypass grafting to decrease its footprint.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Climate change and cardiovascular health: Recent updates and actions for healthcare.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2024
    Article
  20. Environmental Sustainability Initiatives in the Operating Room: A Scoping Review.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Geoffroy DitacDepartment of Electrophysiology, Hôpital Cardiologique Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 28 avenue du Doyen Lepine, 69500 Bron, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4833-4347
Pierre-Jean CottinetINSA-Lyon, LGEF, Université de Lyon, 20 Av. Albert Einstein, 69100 Villeurbanne, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5607-1578
Minh Quyen LeINSA-Lyon, LGEF, Université de Lyon, 20 Av. Albert Einstein, 69100 Villeurbanne, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5907-159X
Daniel GrinbergDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Hôpital Cardiologique Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 28 avenue du Doyen Lepine, 69500 Bron, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3184-5095
Josselin DuchateauDepartment of electrophysiology, CHU Bordeaux, Université de Bordeaux, IHU LIRYC, Av. du Haut Lévêque, 33600 Pessac, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4367-1117
Kévin GardeyDepartment of Electrophysiology, Hôpital Cardiologique Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 28 avenue du Doyen Lepine, 69500 Bron, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9203-4544
Arnaud DulacDepartment of Electrophysiology, Hôpital Cardiologique Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 28 avenue du Doyen Lepine, 69500 Bron, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2298-1156
Antoine DelinièreDepartment of Electrophysiology, Hôpital Cardiologique Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 28 avenue du Doyen Lepine, 69500 Bron, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3742-9674
Christelle HaddadDepartment of Electrophysiology, Hôpital Cardiologique Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 28 avenue du Doyen Lepine, 69500 Bron, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6289-0799
Julie Boussuge-RozeDepartment of electrophysiology, CHU Bordeaux, Université de Bordeaux, IHU LIRYC, Av. du Haut Lévêque, 33600 Pessac, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5280-5749
Frédéric SacherDepartment of electrophysiology, CHU Bordeaux, Université de Bordeaux, IHU LIRYC, Av. du Haut Lévêque, 33600 Pessac, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8348-9320
Pierre JaïsDepartment of electrophysiology, CHU Bordeaux, Université de Bordeaux, IHU LIRYC, Av. du Haut Lévêque, 33600 Pessac, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4700-7811
Philippe ChevalierDepartment of Electrophysiology, Hôpital Cardiologique Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 28 avenue du Doyen Lepine, 69500 Bron, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8185-2229
Francis BessièreDepartment of Electrophysiology, Hôpital Cardiologique Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 28 avenue du Doyen Lepine, 69500 Bron, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3642-9795
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRLille’s Cardiology Hospital · FRUniversité de Bordeaux · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsClimate change represents the biggest global health threat of the 21st century. Health care system is itself a large contributor to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In cardiology, atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation is an increasing activity using numerous non-reusable materials that could contribute to GHG emission. Determining a detailed carbon footprint analysis of an AF catheter ablation procedure allows the identification of the main polluting sources that give opportunities for reduction of environmental impact. To assess the carbon footprint of AF catheter ablation procedure. To determine priority actions to decrease pollution. METHODS AND

resultsAn eco-audit method used to predict the GHG emission of an AF catheter ablation procedure was investigated. Two workstations were considered including surgery and anaesthesia. In the operating room, every waste produced by single-use medical devices, pharmaceutical drugs, and energy consumption during intervention were evaluated. All analyses were limited to the operating room. Thirty procedures were analysed over a period of 8 weeks: 18 pulmonary veins isolation RF ablations, 7 complex RF procedures including PVI, roof and mitral isthmus lines, ethanol infusion of the Marshall vein and cavo tricuspid isthmus line, and 5 pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon. The mean emission during AF catheter ablation procedures was 76.9 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e). The operating field accounted for 75.4% of the carbon footprint, while only 24.6% for the anaesthesia workstation. On one hand, material production and manufacturing were the most polluting phases of product life cycle which, respectively, represented 71.3% (54.8 kg of CO2-e) and 17.0% (13.1 kg of CO2-e) of total pollution. On the other hand, transport contributed in 10.6% (8.1 kg of CO2-e), while product use resulted in 1.1% (0.9 kg of CO2-e) of GHG production. Electrophysiology catheters were demonstrated to be the main contributors of environmental impact with 29.9 kg of CO2-e (i.e. 38.8%). Three dimensional mapping system and electrocardiogram patches were accounting for 6.8 kg of CO2-e (i.e. 8.8% of total).

conclusionAF catheter ablation involves a mean of 76.9 kg of CO2-e. With an estimated 600 000 annual worldwide procedures, the environmental impact of AF catheter ablation activity is estimated equal to 125 tons of CO2 emission each day. It represents an equivalent of 700 000 km of car ride every day. Electrophysiology catheters and patches are the main contributors of the carbon footprint. The focus must be on reducing, reusing, and recycling these items to limit the impact of AF ablation on the environment. A road map of steps to implement in different time frames is proposed.

Indexed as

Ablation TechniquesAtrial FibrillationCatheter AblationPulmonary VeinsCarbon DioxideCarbon FootprintHumansTreatment OutcomeCarbon DioxideAtrial fibrillationCarbon footprintCatheter ablationEco-auditEnvironment

Identifiers

PMID36107465
PMCPMC10103577
OpenAlexW4295898147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.