Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36107424›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Acceptance of Different Self-sampling Methods for Semiweekly SARS-CoV-2 Testing in Asymptomatic Children and Childcare Workers at German Day Care Centers: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.

Geraldine Engels, Johannes Forster, Andrea Streng, Viktoria Rücker, Paul Rudolph, Franziska Pietsch, Julia Wallstabe, Lars Wallstabe, Maike Krauthausen, Julia Schmidt and 16 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Error in Figure 3.JAMA network open · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Geraldine EngelsDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Johannes ForsterInstitute for Hygiene and Microbiology, University of Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Andrea StrengDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Viktoria RückerInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Paul RudolphLeibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology-Hans-Knoell-Institute, Jena, Germany.
Franziska PietschInstitute for Hygiene and Microbiology, University of Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Julia WallstabeInstitute for Hygiene and Microbiology, University of Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Lars WallstabeInstitute for Hygiene and Microbiology, University of Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Maike KrauthausenDepartment of General Practice, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Julia SchmidtInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Timo LudwigInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Carsten BauerInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
David GierszewskiDepartment of General Practice, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Jesper BendigDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Sandra TimmeLeibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology-Hans-Knoell-Institute, Jena, Germany.
Thomas JansDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Benedikt WeißbrichInstitute for Virology and Immunobiology, University of Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Marcel RomanosDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Lars DölkenInstitute for Virology and Immunobiology, University of Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Peter HeuschmannInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Christoph HärtelDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Ildikó GágyorDepartment of General Practice, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Marc Thilo FiggeLeibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology-Hans-Knoell-Institute, Jena, Germany.
Johannes LieseDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Oliver KurzaiInstitute for Hygiene and Microbiology, University of Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Wue-KiTa-CoV 2.0-Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Closure of day care centers (DCCs) to contain the COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with negative effects on children's health and well-being. Objective: To investigate the acceptance of self-sampling methods for continuous SARS-CoV-2 surveillance among asymptomatic children and childcare workers (CCWs) in DCCs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nonrandomized pilot study included children and CCWs at 9 DCCs in Wuerzburg, Germany, from May to July 2021. Interventions: Twice weekly testing for SARS-CoV-2 was conducted by self-sampled mouth-rinsing fluid (saliva sampling [SAL], with subsequent pooled polymerase chain reaction test) plus nasal rapid antigen self-test (RAgT) (group 1), SAL only (group 2), or RAgT only (group 3) in children and CCWs. Main Outcomes and Measures: Main outcomes were rates for initial acceptance and successful (≥60% of scheduled samples) long-term participation. The probability of SARS-CoV-2 introduction into DCCs was modeled as a function of age-adjusted background incidence and DCC size. Results: Of 836 eligible children, 452 (54.1%; 95% CI, 50.7%-57.4%) participated (median [IQR] age: 4 [3-5] years; 213 [47.1%] girls), including 215 (47.6%) in group 1, 172 (38.1%) in group 2, and 65 (14.4%) in group 3. Of 190 CCWs, 139 (73.2%; 95% CI, 66.4%-79.0%) participated (median [IQR] age: 30 [25-46] years; 128 [92.1%] women), including 96 (69.1%) in group 1, 29 (20.9%) in group 2, and 14 (10.1%) in group 3. Overall, SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests on 5306 SAL samples and 2896 RAgTs were performed in children, with 1 asymptomatic child detected by PCR from SAL. Successful long-term participation was highest in group 2 (SAL only; children: 111 of 172 [64.5%]; CCWs: 18 of 29 [62.1%]). Weekly participation rates in children ranged from 54.0% to 83.8% for SAL and from 44.6% to 61.4% for RAgT. Participation rates decreased during the study course (P < .001). The probability of SARS-CoV-2 introduction into a DCC with 50 children was estimated to reach at most 5% for an age-adjusted SARS-CoV-2 incidence below 143. Conclusions and Relevance: Self-sampling for continuous SARS-CoV-2 testing was well accepted, with SAL being the preferred method. Given the high number of negative tests, thresholds for initiating continuous testing should be established based on age-adjusted SARS-CoV-2 incidence rates. Trial Registration: German Registry for Clinical Trials Identifier: DRKS00025546.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2AdultChildChild CareChild HealthChild, PreschoolCOVID-19 TestingDay Care, MedicalFemaleHumansMalePandemicsPilot Projects

Identifiers

PMID36107424
PMCPMC9478779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.