Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36107373›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2022

General guidelines for CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing in plants.

Emre Aksoy, Kubilay Yildirim, Musa Kavas, Ceyhun Kayihan, Bayram Ali Yerlikaya, Irmak Çalik, İlkay Sevgen, Ufuk Demirel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. From Lab to Field: CRISPRing Major CultivatedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Development of Highly Efficient Resistance toInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Emre AksoyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey. emreaks@metu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9410-2715
Kubilay YildirimDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey. kubilay.yildirim@omu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1495-5866
Musa Kavas *Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5903-2873
Ceyhun Kayihan *Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Başkent University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1684-4147
Bayram Ali YerlikayaDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2864-7709
Irmak ÇalikDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Başkent University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8185-2453
İlkay SevgenDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1254-3515
Ufuk Demirel *Department of Agricultural Genetic Engineering, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University, Niğde, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3457-5086
Ondokuz Mayıs University · TRBaşkent University · TRMiddle East Technical University · TRNiğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)/Cas (CRISPR-associated) technology is a versatile genome editing tool that has been used to improve agriculturally important plant traits. Due to its precision, CRISPR/Cas9 is more effective than either conventional plant breeding methods or standard genetic engineering approaches for the rapid development of new varieties resilient to climate change. In addition to knowledge in tissue culture-based plant transformation, effective gene-specific single guide RNA (sgRNA) design, prediction of its off-target effect and utilization of vectors, promoters, Cas proteins and terminators is required for CRISPR/Cas9. Various bioinformatics tools are available for the best sgRNA design and screening of the off-targets. Various tools are used in the delivery of CRISPR/Cas components into cells and the genome. Moreover, some recent studies proved the simultaneous silencing of different paralogs in the same family or several genes working in the same pathway by using multiple-target sgRNA designs. This review summarizes the type of promoters, Cas proteins, recognition sequences, and terminators available for the development of knock-out and overexpression plant lines. It also provides a general guideline for the development of genome-edited plants from the design of sgRNAs to the selection of non-transgenic genome-edited T

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingGenetic EngineeringGenome, PlantPlant BreedingPlantsRNA, Small UntranslatedRNA, Small UntranslatedBreedingCRISPRGenome-editingMultiple-targetsRNAPssgRNA

Identifiers

PMID36107373
OpenAlexW4295903502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.