ReviewMolecular biology reports2022
Protective and deleterious effects of autophagy in the setting of myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury: an overview.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Semaglutide enhances PINK1/Parkin‑dependent mitophagy in hypoxia/reoxygenation‑induced cardiomyocyte injury.Molecular medicine reports · 2025Article
- Protective Effects of Panax notoginseng Saponins on Cerebral Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury: Insights Into SIRT1/NRF2/HO-1 Pathway Activation.Physiological research · 2025Article
- Autophagy stimulation influenced the angiogenesis and metastasis behavior of human triple-negative breast cancer cells.BioImpacts : BI · 2025Article
- Protective effects of naringenin and naringin in organ ischemia/reperfusion injuries: a comprehensive narrative review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Rhein alleviates myocardial ischemic injury by inhibiting mitochondrial division, activating mitochondrial autophagy and suppressing myocardial cell apoptosis through the Drp1/Pink1/Parkin pathway.Molecular biology reports · 2024Article
- Adenosine 2 receptor regulates autophagy and apoptosis to alleviate ischemia reperfusion injury in type 2 diabetes via IRE-1 signaling.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Article
- A bibliometric analysis of myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury from 2000 to 2023.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAutophagy is known as a conserved mechanism in order to preserve cell survival under various stress conditions via maintaining cellular homeostasis. Although autophagy is active in the heart at baseline and plays a critical role in cell survival, inappropriate activation of autophagy following ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury leads to cell death. MAIN TEXT: The distinct functions of autophagy in myocardial I/R injury condition have been examined in numerous studies, however, contradicting results have been achieved in this field. These studies have documented that autophagy acts as a double-edged sword in myocardial I/R injury. Clarifying the exact role of autophagy in determining the health or death of cardiomyocytes under I/R injury is very helpful to achieve better cardioprotection in prospective clinical studies. Thus, autophagy may be an interesting target for the treatment or prevention of myocardial I/R injury. But before considering this matter, it is necessary to address the gaps in our knowledge about the complex role of autophagy in myocardial I/R injury.
conclusionIn this review, by providing updated data about the role of autophagy in the heart during ischemia and reperfusion, we tried to provide more insights in this context and encourage scientists to pay special attention towards manipulating autophagy as an intriguing and powerful approach in cardioprotection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.