ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2022
Genetic Variation and Mendelian Randomization Approaches.
Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While genome-wide association studies (GWAS) on levels of nuclear receptors are sparse, the genetics of ligands of these receptors (steroid hormones, thyroid hormones, and liposoluble vitamins) have been extensively studied in GWAS of predominantly European populations. Hundreds of genetic variants across the genome have been associated with serum levels of nuclear receptor ligands, shedding light on the physiology of hormone metabolism. These GWAS findings have been used to explore causal associations of these hormones with complex human traits and diseases in Mendelian randomization (MR) studies, and in studies using polygenic risk scores to quantify the genetic predisposition to higher/lower hormone levels. As such, besides providing insights into hormonal pathophysiology and its causal relationship with clinical complications, GWAS-identified genetic markers could ultimately play an important role in the daily clinical management of patients. As large trans-ethnic GWAS on levels of nuclear receptor ligands emerge, and with the fast advances in genotyping techniques and constant decrease of the genotyping costs, studying an individual's genetically predicted hormonal profile could be the next step in personalizing the management of patients with pathologies related to nuclear receptors and their ligands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.