Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36107306›Full record

ArticlePharmacoEconomics - open2023

Estimating the Economic and Clinical Value of Introducing Ceftazidime/Avibactam into Antimicrobial Practice in Japan: A Dynamic Modelling Study.

Tetsuya Matsumoto, Akira Yuasa, Ryan Miller, Clive Pritchard, Takahisa Ohashi, Amer Taie, Jason Gordon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PharmacoEconomics - open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Efficacy of Ceftazidime-avibactam in treating Gram-negative infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tetsuya MatsumotoDepartment of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Japan.
Akira YuasaPfizer Japan Inc., Shinjuku Bunka Quint Building, 3-22-7, Yoyogi, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, 151-8589, Japan. akira.yuasa@pfizer.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3699-7231
Ryan MillerHealth Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd., Cardiff, UK.
Clive PritchardHealth Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd., Cardiff, UK.
Takahisa OhashiPfizer Japan Inc., Shinjuku Bunka Quint Building, 3-22-7, Yoyogi, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, 151-8589, Japan.
Amer TaiePfizer R&D UK Limited, Tadworth, UK.
Jason GordonHealth Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd., Cardiff, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the most serious public health challenges worldwide, including in Japan. Globally, research and development of new antimicrobials has stalled due to unfavorable market conditions, which undervalue antimicrobials. Furthermore, Japan faces the additional challenge of delayed commercialization for a number of recently approved treatments.

objectiveThis study aims to examine the impact on AMR of introducing a new anti-infective treatment, ceftazidime/avibactam, into current treatment strategies. It reports the resulting clinical and economic outcomes from the perspective of healthcare payers in Japan.

methodsA previously published and validated dynamic disease transmission model was adapted to the Japanese setting. The model estimated health economic outcomes for treating three Gram-negative hospital-acquired infections, under different treatment strategies, from a healthcare payers' perspective. Outcomes were assessed over a 10-year time horizon with a willingness-to-pay threshold of ¥5,000,000 (US$45,556) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained and an annual discount rate of 2% applied to costs and benefits.

resultsIntroducing ceftazidime/avibactam in the framework of a diversification strategy with piperacillin/tazobactam is associated with reducing 798,640 bed days, equating to ¥21.0 billion (US$190.9 million) savings in hospitalization costs, and a gain of 363,034 life-years, or 308,641 QALYs. This translates into a monetary benefit of ¥1.56 trillion (US$14.3 billion) to Japanese healthcare payers. DISCUSSION: Introducing a new antimicrobial agent into clinical practice is associated with considerable clinical and economic benefits. This analysis demonstrates that the approach taken to incorporate a new antimicrobial agent into clinical practice impacts on the scale of these clinical and economic benefits; greater benefits are associated with earlier use of antimicrobials as part of an antimicrobial stewardship program.

conclusionThis analysis shows that changing the way in which a new antimicrobial is used within a treatment strategy has the potential for additional significant clinical and economic value.

Identifiers

PMID36107306
PMCPMC9476387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.