ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2022
GCMC and electronic evaluation of pesticide capture by IRMOF systems.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Theoretical Study of CHACS omega · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Environmental contamination by pesticides is a recurrent problem, and a way to minimize its impacts and provide the reduction of contaminants already in the environment is a challenge. In this context, porous materials such as metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have gained prominence. MOFs can carry the pesticide when physically or chemically interacting with its pore sites, enabling pesticide capture. However, evaluating the best MOF to maximize the process is an important step that can be performed under computer simulation. This work used grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations to assess the interaction between glyphosate, atrazine, acephate, and dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane pesticides with the structures of IRMOF-1, IRMOF-8, IRMOF-10, and IRMOF-16. These MOFs present several organic unit types, which generate different pore volumes with similar chemical environment. For glyphosate, atrazine, and acephate, a direct relationship was shown between the pore volume and the amount of captured pesticide, which is a direct contribution from the strong interaction between the pesticides. Higher pore volumes maximize glyphosate, atrazine, and acephate capture. Otherwise, for dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, the larger the pore volume, the smaller the amount of pesticide is loaded. The interaction between all pesticides and IRMOFs is mainly governed by van der Waals contribution, being more pronounced for glyphosate, atrazine, and acephate molecules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.