ArticlePediatric surgery international2022
Pelvic exams and cervical cancer screening in patients with anorectal malformations.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCongenital or acquired anatomic differences of the genital tract in patients with anorectal malformations (ARM) may make pelvic exams more challenging. The purpose of this study was to describe office-based pelvic exams and cervical cancer screening among female patients with a history of ARM.
methodsThis was an IRB approved, cross-sectional study of female patients with ARM who completed our Reproductive Health Surveys from November 2021 to March 2022.
resultsFifty-four patients with ARM were included in the study. Ages ranged from 22 to 80 years (mean age 34.5 years). Thirty-four patients had a cloaca, 16 had an ARM other than cloaca, and four patients had a complex malformation. Most patients (79.6%) reported having had a pelvic exam in the office. On a scale of 0-100, the mean pain score with pelvic exam was 42. Pain scores were higher for patients with complex malformations and neo-vagina. Forty-three participants (79.6%) had cervical cancer screening. Fifteen participants (28%) had a didelphys uterus but only two patients specified that both cervices were screened for cervical cancer.
conclusionThe majority of female patients with ARM had cervical cancer screening in clinic, those with complex malformations reported greater discomfort. Providers should be aware of barriers to performing pelvic exams in patients with ARM as well as the need to screen both cervices in didelphys uterus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36107236What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.