Trial reportArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2023
Intravenous ferric derisomaltose versus oral iron for persistent iron deficient pregnant women: a randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Intravenous Iron Isomaltoside Versus Oral Iron Supplementation for Treatment of Iron Deficiency in Pregnancy: a Randomised, Comparative, Open-label Trial
Randomized Control Trial: Intravenous Iron Versus Oral Iron for the Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia in Pregnancy
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect and safety of intravenous iron compared to oral iron for treatment of iron deficiency anaemia in pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical outcome post treatment of anemia in pregnancy with intravenous versus oral iron therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical effectiveness of ferric carboxymaltose (iv) versus iron sucrose (iv) in treatment of iron deficiency anaemia in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.The Indian journal of medical research · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy of Single-Dose Intravenous Ferric Derisomaltose for Iron Deficiency Anemia in Pregnancy.American journal of hematology · 2026Trial
- Review
- Review
- Preoperative Iron Isomaltoside administration enhances postoperative anemia recovery in robotic pancreatic surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Recommendations for the treatment of iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia during pregnancy based on patient blood management strategies.Chinese medical journal · 2026Article
- Review
- Attitudes towards ferric derisomaltose among Swiss patients with iron deficiency and their treating physicians: the prospective, observational Real-CHOICE study.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Observational
- Observational
- Management of iron deficiency in children, adults, and pregnant individuals: evidence-based and expert consensus recommendations.The Lancet. Haematology · 2025Review
- Real-world evaluation of an intravenous iron service for the treatment of iron deficiency with or without anemia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Iron optimisation in pregnancy: a Haematology in Obstetric and Women's Health Collaborative consensus statement.Internal medicine journal · 2025Article
- Comparing the Treatment Outcomes of Oral and Injectable Iron Therapies for Anemia in Pregnancy: A Meta-Analysis.Cureus · 2025Review
- Identifying and treating iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2023Article
- The incidence, complications, and treatment of iron deficiency in pregnancy.European journal of haematology · 2022Review
- Protocol for a multicenter, double-blinded placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial comparing intravenous ferric derisomaltose to oral ferrous sulfate for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy: The IVIDA2 trial.Contemporary clinical trials · 2022Article
- National Bleeding Disorder Foundation Clinical Practice Recommendations for Laboratory Screening of Iron Deficiency With and Without Anemia in the Inherited Bleeding Disorders Population.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of HemophiliaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare the efficacy of intravenous (IV) iron (ferric derisomaltose) with oral iron (ferrous fumarate) in women 14-21 weeks pregnant with persistent iron deficiency (ferritin < 30 µg/L).
methodsIn a single-centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial at a Danish hospital, women with persistent iron deficiency after routine oral iron treatment were allocated to receive 1000 mg IV iron (single-dose) or 100 mg elemental oral iron daily. Outcomes were assessed during an 18-week follow-up period. The primary endpoint was the proportion of non-anaemic (haemoglobin [Hb] ≥ 11 g/dL) women throughout follow-up. Other outcomes included changes in haematological parameters, patient-reported fatigue, and quality of life (QoL). Safety was assessed by recording adverse events.
resultsFrom July 2017 to February 2020, 100 women were randomised to IV iron and 101 to oral iron. Throughout follow-up, 91% of women were non-anaemic in the IV iron group compared with 73% in the oral iron group (18% difference [95% confidence interval 0.10-0.25]; p < 0.001). The mean Hb increase was significantly greater with IV iron versus oral iron at Weeks 6 (0.4 versus - 0.2 g/dL; p < 0.001), 12 (0.5 versus 0.1 g/dL; p < 0.001), and 18 (0.8 versus 0.5 g/dL; p = 0.01). Improvements in fatigue and QoL were greater with IV iron versus oral iron at Weeks 3 and 6. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was comparable between treatment groups.
conclusionIV iron was superior in preventing anaemia compared with oral iron in pregnant women with persistent iron deficiency; biochemical superiority was accompanied by improved fatigue and QoL. CLINICAL
trial registrationEuropean Clinical Trials Database: EudraCT no.: 2017-000776-29 (3 May 2017); ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03188445 (13 June 2017). The trial protocol has been published: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186%2Fs13063-020-04637-z .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.