ArticleWorld journal of urology2022
Nomogram based on baseline clinicopathological characteristics for predicting bladder cancer-specific survival to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Article in World journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Impact of timing of computed tomography staging and patient factors on the detection of 'true' cN+ bladder cancer.BJU international · 2025Article
- A Systematic Literature Review of Real-World Treatment Effectiveness and Economic and Humanistic Burden in Patients With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Who Underwent Radical Cystectomy.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo develop a risk score based on a prognostic model and a nomogram integrating baseline clinicopathological variables to predict bladder cancer-specific survival (BCSS) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients.
methodsWe retrospectively identified a consecutive sample of 247 MIBC patients treated with cisplatin-based NAC-plus-cystectomy in two Spanish hospitals between 2000 and 2019. Age at MIBC diagnosis, sex, histology, lymphovascular invasion, previous non-MIBC, hydronephrosis, and clinical TNM were included in the initial Cox regression model. A risk score was computed based on the final prognostic model and a nomogram was used to estimate BCSS at 2 and 5 years.
resultsMedian age was 66 years; 89% were males; 83% had pure urothelial carcinoma; 16.2% had previous non-MIBC. Clinical stage was T2N0, T3-4aN0, and Tx-4N + in 24%, 57%, and 19% of patients, respectively. Complete pathological response was seen in 29.4% and downstaging to non-MIBC (ypT1, ypTa, ypTis) in 12.5% of patients. Overall 5-year BCSS was 59%. Four prognostic factors were identified: variant histology, previous non-MIBC, female sex and hydronephrosis. By adding the points attributed to each of these factors, we categorized patients in three groups: low-risk (0 points); intermediate-risk (1-9 points); high-risk (≥ 10 points). Five-year BCSS was 72%, 53%, and 15%, respectively (p < 0.0001).
conclusionWe developed a nomogram and risk score based on four baseline clinicopathological characteristics to predict BCSS to NAC-plus-cystectomy in MIBC patients. If validated in prospective studies, this nomogram can be useful for selecting patients likely to benefit from NAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36107212What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.