Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36107159›Full record

ReviewExpert review of neurotherapeutics2022

Psychotherapeutic treatments for generalized anxiety disorder: cognitive and behavioral therapies, enhancement strategies, and emerging efforts.

Michelle G Newman, Candice Basterfield, Thane M Erickson, Evan Caulley, Amy Przeworski, Sandra J Llera

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of neurotherapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle G NewmanDepartment of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, Park, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0873-1409
Candice BasterfieldDepartment of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, Park, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2736-5216
Thane M EricksonDepartment of Psychology, Seattle Pacific University, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2051-8486
Evan CaulleyDepartment of Psychology, Seattle Pacific University, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4321-3041
Amy PrzeworskiDepartment of Psychology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0149-7077
Sandra J LleraDepartment of Psychology, Towson University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2466-8289
Pennsylvania State University · USSeattle Pacific University · USCase Western Reserve University · USTowson University · US

Funding

Harnessing Mobile Technology to Reduce Mental Health Disorders in College PopulationsR01MH115128 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EISENBERG, DANIEL, NEWMAN, MICHELLE G · 2018 to 2022
$4.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH115128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGeneralized anxiety disorder (GAD) is common and disabling. Different versions of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) have been tested, but no treatment works for everyone. Therefore, researchers have attempted approaches to enhance CBT. AREAS COVERED: The current narrative review examines meta-analyses and individual trials of CBT-based treatments for GAD. We focus on CBT and its cognitive and behavioral components as well as efforts to enhance CBT and its dissemination and generalizability. Enhancement efforts included interpersonal and emotional processing therapy, mindfulness-based CBT, emotion regulation therapy, intolerance of uncertainty therapy, the unified protocol, metacognitive therapy, motivational interviewing, and contrast avoidance targeted treatment. Emerging strategies to enhance dissemination have focused on technologically based treatments. Attempts at generalizability have included examination of efficacy within diverse racial and ethnic groups. EXPERT OPINION: We conclude that CBT is efficacious, and a number of enhancement efforts have shown some promise in improving upon CBT in single trials. However, more research is needed, particularly efforts to determine which enhancements work best for which individuals and what are the mechanisms of change. Furthermore, few technological interventions have been compared to active treatments. Finally, much more attention needs to be paid to ethnic and racial diversity in randomized controlled trials.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyMotivational InterviewingAnxiety DisordersBehavior TherapyCognitionHumansPsychotropic DrugsTreatment OutcomePsychotropic DrugsCBTcognitive behavioral therapyGADgeneralized anxiety disorderPsychotherapy

Identifiers

PMID36107159
PMCPMC9754763
OpenAlexW4295903892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.