Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36107113›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2022

The Impact of Image Processing Algorithms on Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Metrics and Study Conclusions in Diabetic Retinopathy.

Isaac G Freedman, Emily Li, Lucy Hui, Ron A Adelman, Kristen Nwanyanwu, Jay C Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cytomegalovirus-positive Posner-Schlossman syndrome: to compare differences in retinal vessel area density between the affected and non-affected eye using optical coherence tomography angiography.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Isaac G FreedmanDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Emily LiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Lucy HuiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Ron A AdelmanDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Kristen NwanyanwuDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Jay C WangDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Yale University · USRetina Vitreous Associates of Florida · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of image processing on quantitative metrics in optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images and study conclusions in patients with diabetes. Methods: This was a single center, retrospective cross-sectional study. OCTA imaging with the Cirrus HD-OCT 5000 AngioPlex of patients with diabetes was performed. The 8 × 8 mm superficial slab images underwent 4 different preprocessing methods (none, background subtraction [BGS], foveal avascular zone brightness adjustment, and contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization [CLAHE]) followed by 4 different binarization algorithms (global Huang, global Otsu, local Niblack, and local Phansalkar) in ImageJ. Vessel density (VD), skeletonized VD (SVD), and fractal dimension (FD) were calculated. Mixed-effect multivariate linear regressions were performed. Results: Two hundred eleven scans from 104 patients were included. Of these scans, 67 (31.8%) had no diabetic retinopathy (DR), 99 (46.9%) had nonproliferative DR (NPDR), and 45 (21.3%) had proliferative DR (PDR). Forty-eight of 211 (22.7%) scans had diabetic macular edema (DME). The image processing method used significantly impacted values of VD, SVD, and FD (all P -values < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, the image processing method changed the clinical variables significantly associated with VD, SVD, and FD. However, BGS and CLAHE yielded more consistent significant covariates across multiple binarization algorithms. Conclusions: The image processing method can impact the conclusions of any given study analyzing quantitative OCTA metrics. Thus, caution is urged in the interpretation of such studies. Background subtraction or CLAHE may play a role in the standardization of image processing. Translational Relevance: This work proposes strategies to achieve robust and consistent analysis of OCTA imaging, which is especially important for clinical trials.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic RetinopathyMacular EdemaAlgorithmsCross-Sectional StudiesFluorescein AngiographyHumansRetinal VesselsRetrospective StudiesTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID36107113
PMCPMC9483236
OpenAlexW4295904372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.