Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36106328›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

How to learn with intentional mistakes: NoisyEnsembles to overcome poor tissue quality for deep learning in computational pathology.

Robin S Mayer, Steffen Gretser, Lara E Heckmann, Paul K Ziegler, Britta Walter, Henning Reis, Katrin Bankov, Sven Becker, Jochen Triesch, Peter J Wild and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Robin S MayerDr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Steffen GretserDr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Lara E HeckmannDr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Paul K ZieglerDr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Britta WalterDr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Henning ReisDr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Katrin BankovDr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Sven BeckerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Jochen TrieschFrankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS), Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Peter J WildDr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Nadine FlinnerDr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a lot of recent interest in the field of computational pathology, as many algorithms are introduced to detect, for example, cancer lesions or molecular features. However, there is a large gap between artificial intelligence (AI) technology and practice, since only a small fraction of the applications is used in routine diagnostics. The main problems are the transferability of convolutional neural network (CNN) models to data from other sources and the identification of uncertain predictions. The role of tissue quality itself is also largely unknown. Here, we demonstrated that samples of the TCGA ovarian cancer (TCGA-OV) dataset from different tissue sources have different quality characteristics and that CNN performance is linked to this property. CNNs performed best on high-quality data. Quality control tools were partially able to identify low-quality tiles, but their use did not increase the performance of the trained CNNs. Furthermore, we trained NoisyEnsembles by introducing label noise during training. These NoisyEnsembles could improve CNN performance for low-quality, unknown datasets. Moreover, the performance increases as the ensemble become more consistent, suggesting that incorrect predictions could be discarded efficiently to avoid wrong diagnostic decisions.

Indexed as

computational pathologydata perturbationdeep learningensemble learningmachine learningovarian cancerquality controltissue quality

Identifiers

PMID36106328
PMCPMC9464871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.