ArticleAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2022
Prevalence of thoracic aortic aneurysm in patients referred for no/low-charge coronary artery calcium scoring: Insights from the CLARIFY registry.
Article in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04075162 (Community Benefit of No-charge Calcium Score Screening Program), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Community Benefit of No-charge Calcium Score Screening Program
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI-Facilitated Assessment of Built Environment Using Neighborhood Satellite Imagery and Cardiovascular Risk.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Low-dose cardiac-gated chest CTs allow for simultaneous evaluation of coronary artery calcification and aortic size. We sought to evaluate the prevalence of thoracic aortic dilation (TAD) and thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) in a large cohort of patients undergoing coronary artery calcium (CAC) screening. Methods: We reviewed all patients from a large, prospective no-charge CAC screening program (CLARIFY, Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04075162) for whom measurements of the ascending aorta were available. TAD was defined as an ascending aortic diameter ≥4.0cm, while TAA was defined as ascending aortic diameter ≥ 4.5cm. We explored associations between patient characteristics, CAC, and the prevalence of TAD/TAA. Results: A total of 36,356 patients enrolled in the CLARIFY program underwent analysis for TAD/TAA. 3,130 patients (8.6%) had TAD and 237 (0.7%) had TAA. Patients with TAA were older (63±8 vs 59±10 years, Conclusion: In this large, prospective study of patients undergoing no-charge CAC screening, 8.6% had TAD (≥4.0cm) and 0.7% had TAA (≥4.5cm). Our results highlight a high yield of TAD/TAA diagnosis in this targeted cohort with cardiovascular risk factors and supports the role of no-charge CAC as a population-level strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.