Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36106100›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Scalable radiotherapy data curation infrastructure for deep-learning based autosegmentation of organs-at-risk: A case study in head and neck cancer.

E Tryggestad, A Anand, C Beltran, J Brooks, J Cimmiyotti, N Grimaldi, T Hodge, A Hunzeker, J J Lucido, N N Laack and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

E TryggestadDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, United States.
A AnandDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
C BeltranDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
J BrooksDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, United States.
J CimmiyottiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, United States.
N GrimaldiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, United States.
T HodgeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, United States.
A HunzekerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, United States.
J J LucidoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, United States.
N N LaackDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, United States.
R MomohDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, United States.
D J MoseleyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, United States.
S H PatelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
A RidgwayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
S SeetamsettyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, United States.
S ShiraishiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, United States.
L UndahlDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, United States.
R L FooteDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this era of patient-centered, outcomes-driven and adaptive radiotherapy, deep learning is now being successfully applied to tackle imaging-related workflow bottlenecks such as autosegmentation and dose planning. These applications typically require supervised learning approaches enabled by relatively large, curated radiotherapy datasets which are highly reflective of the contemporary standard of care. However, little has been previously published describing technical infrastructure, recommendations, methods or standards for radiotherapy dataset curation in a holistic fashion. Our radiation oncology department has recently embarked on a large-scale project in partnership with an external partner to develop deep-learning-based tools to assist with our radiotherapy workflow, beginning with autosegmentation of organs-at-risk. This project will require thousands of carefully curated radiotherapy datasets comprising all body sites we routinely treat with radiotherapy. Given such a large project scope, we have approached the need for dataset curation rigorously, with an aim towards building infrastructure that is compatible with efficiency, automation and scalability. Focusing on our first use-case pertaining to head and neck cancer, we describe our developed infrastructure and novel methods applied to radiotherapy dataset curation, inclusive of personnel and workflow organization, dataset selection, expert organ-at-risk segmentation, quality assurance, patient de-identification, data archival and transfer. Over the course of approximately 13 months, our expert multidisciplinary team generated 490 curated head and neck radiotherapy datasets. This task required approximately 6000 human-expert hours in total (not including planning and infrastructure development time). This infrastructure continues to evolve and will support ongoing and future project efforts.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceautosegmentationconvolutional neural networkcurationdeep learninghead and neck cancerorgans-at-riskradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID36106100
PMCPMC9464982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.