Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36105931›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2022

Clinical Observation of Botulinum Toxin Injection in the Treatment of Focal Dystonia and Muscle Spasm.

Zhen Zhang

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Zhen ZhangNeurology, Panjin Central Hospital, Panjin, 124013 Liaoning, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9298-2042

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dystonia and muscle spasms are a group of common and unfavorable clinical neurological symptoms. The use of botulinum toxin (BTX-A) abroad has achieved good results in the treatment of various movement disorders characterized by involuntary or abnormal muscle contractions. It is expected to open up a new field for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDs) such as focal dystonia and muscle spasm. There are theoretical and practical implications for the diagnosis and development of some effective neurological treatments. The efficacy of BTX-A in the treatment of various focal dystonia and muscle spasm disorders is as follows: symptoms were improved to varying degrees after injection of Botox or botulinum toxin type A (CBTX-A), but Botox or CBTx. There was no significant difference in the efficacy of A. 30.4% of patients had complete remission, 57.8% had significant remission, and 8.9% had partial remission. Among them, HFS and BS had the best curative effect, and the symptoms were significantly improved by 95.3% and 89.4%, respectively. The efficacy of CD was also satisfactory, with 75.5% of the patients showing significant improvement in symptoms, followed by Meg/OMD (OMD) with 73.3% and SD with 3.3%. The efficacy of WC is poor, and functional improvement is uncertain. Other forms of focal dystonia and spasticity also showed significant functional improvement in 60% of patients. Most patients start to see effects within 1 week after BTX-A injection, symptoms gradually improve, and the bridge of curative effect is reached in 2-4 weeks, and the healing effect lasts for about 3-5 months on average. The overall severity of adverse effects was not severe and resolved spontaneously within a few days to ten weeks, with the most concerning complications being ptosis and dysphagia.

Indexed as

Botulinum Toxins, Type ADystoniaDystonic DisordersHumansSpasmTreatment OutcomeBotulinum Toxins, Type A

Identifiers

PMID36105931
PMCPMC9467720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.