ArticleCureus2022
A Scoping Review of the Use of Improvised External Ventricular Drains in Africa.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Handmade external ventricular drainage in resource-limited settings: safety, feasibility, and cost-effectiveness from a Peruvian cohort and global evidence review.Neurosurgical review · 2026Review
- External ventricular drain migration into the cisterna magna: A case report.Surgical neurology international · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Poor access to neurosurgical equipment is one of the problems limiting service delivery in Africa. Improvised surgical devices have long been used in Africa as replacements for high-cost standard versions. In this study, we aimed to see if improvised external ventricular drains (EVD) are being used, how these devices are made, and what their outcomes are. The PRISMA extension for scoping reviews was used in conducting this study. A search was conducted from inception to July 2022. PubMed, Ovid Embase, and African Journal Online were searched. Three studies were identified and used. The methods of making the EVD devices were compared and the incidence proportions of improvised EVD-related infections were calculated. The standard ventricular catheter was replaced by cheaper alternatives like a size 6/8 feeding tube or a 14-gauge central line catheter. The connecting tube had low-cost alternatives, and in a study, was replaced by a fluid infusion set. Aggregated outcomes from the three identified studies show that just over half of the sample survived post-EVD insertion (54%). The incidence proportion of EVD-related infections was 24%. This study describes the experience of African centers with an improvised version of the EVD devices and their outcomes. This will serve as a baseline for more research into the use of improvised EVD devices in low-resource settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.