Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36105895›Full record

ReviewCureus2022

Predictors That Identify Complications Such As Anastomotic Leak in Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Tharun Yadhav Selvamani, Shoukrie I Shoukrie, Jyothirmai Malla, Sathish Venugopal, Ramaneshwar Selvaraj, Ravneet K Dhanoa, Anam Zahra, Ranim K Hamouda, Aishwarya Raman, Jihan Mostafa

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tharun Yadhav SelvamaniGeneral Surgery, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Shoukrie I ShoukrieOrthopaedics and Traumatology, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Jyothirmai MallaInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Sathish VenugopalNeurology, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Ramaneshwar SelvarajInternal Medicine/Family Medicine/General Surgery, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Ravneet K DhanoaInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Anam ZahraSurgery, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Ranim K HamoudaInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Aishwarya RamanInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Jihan MostafaInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leakage of the anastomotic site is considered to be one of the most serious complications after colon and rectal surgery. It is associated with increased mortality, morbidity, and longer hospital stays. This systematic review examines the need for blood markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), albumin, and various other molecular markers that assist in their propensity to diagnose anastomotic leakage (AL) early after surgery. Utilizing PubMed and Google Scholar as resources and including the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for the articles, and studies over the last five years were included. A total of 12 studies have been discussed, and most articles suggest CRP as an excellent indicator. CRP compared to Dutch leakage scores (DLS) and PCT studies suggest that the three combinations improve the predictable outcome of AL. In addition, CRP and PCT have been shown to diagnose AL early in the postoperative period. Other studies include the role of markers of oxidative stress markers, Interleukin-6, Interleukin-10, and other molecular markers in the peritoneal drain which are predictive for identifying AL after three days postoperatively (POD-3). Overall, CRP has proven to be a reliable standard indicator of diagnosis. This is because the postoperative elevation of this protein indicates a problem of leakage with clinical symptoms. Other blood parameters are useful for diagnosis as well, but the limitations are the lack of appropriate studies and the number of randomized controlled trials in this area of ​​study.

Indexed as

anastomotic leakanuscolorectal cancercolorectal surgerycomplicationsc reactive proteininflammatory markerprocalcitoninrectumwhite cell count

Identifiers

PMID36105895
PMCPMC9451042
OpenAlexW4294884262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.