ReviewCureus2022
Predictors That Identify Complications Such As Anastomotic Leak in Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Influence of Analgesic Wound Infiltration on Postoperative Pain and Inflammatory Cytokines in Open Colorectal Surgery: A Randomized Comparative Pilot Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Trial
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prediction Scores for Anastomotic Leak Following Colorectal Surgery.Maedica · 2026Review
- Risk factor analysis and nomogram model development for anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic radical colorectal cancer surgery.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Microenvironment-Responsive Nanomaterials for Colorectal Anastomotic Healing: A Signal-Threshold-Response Framework for Stage-Adaptive Repair.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Identification of postoperative complications in sigmoid colon cancer and rectal cancer using the C-reactive protein level.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Predictive Biomarkers for the Early Detection of Anastomotic Leaks in Colorectal Surgeries: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Early detection of anastomotic leakage in colon cancer surgery: the role of early warning score and C-reactive protein.Annals of coloproctology · 2024Article
- Review
- Analyzing postoperative complications in colorectal cancer surgery: a systematic review enhanced by artificial intelligence.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Review
- The analysis of fecal calprotectin as a diagnostic marker for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: a pilot study.Journal of surgical case reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leakage of the anastomotic site is considered to be one of the most serious complications after colon and rectal surgery. It is associated with increased mortality, morbidity, and longer hospital stays. This systematic review examines the need for blood markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), albumin, and various other molecular markers that assist in their propensity to diagnose anastomotic leakage (AL) early after surgery. Utilizing PubMed and Google Scholar as resources and including the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for the articles, and studies over the last five years were included. A total of 12 studies have been discussed, and most articles suggest CRP as an excellent indicator. CRP compared to Dutch leakage scores (DLS) and PCT studies suggest that the three combinations improve the predictable outcome of AL. In addition, CRP and PCT have been shown to diagnose AL early in the postoperative period. Other studies include the role of markers of oxidative stress markers, Interleukin-6, Interleukin-10, and other molecular markers in the peritoneal drain which are predictive for identifying AL after three days postoperatively (POD-3). Overall, CRP has proven to be a reliable standard indicator of diagnosis. This is because the postoperative elevation of this protein indicates a problem of leakage with clinical symptoms. Other blood parameters are useful for diagnosis as well, but the limitations are the lack of appropriate studies and the number of randomized controlled trials in this area of study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.