Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36105635›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Application of CNN-Based Machine Learning in the Study of Motor Fault Diagnosis.

Xiuyan Peng, Lunpan Wei, Wei Gao

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiuyan PengCollege of Intelligent Systems Science and Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150001, China.
Lunpan WeiCollege of Intelligent Systems Science and Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2416-6630
Wei GaoCollege of Intelligent Systems Science and Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150001, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the development of science and technology, the rapid development of social economy, the motor as a new type of transmission equipment, in the production and life of people occupies a pivotal position. Under the rapid development of computer and electronic technology, manufacturing equipment is becoming larger, faster, more continuous, and more automated. This has resulted in complex, expensive, accident-damaging, and high-impact equipment for electric motors; even routine maintenance requires significant equipment maintenance and maintenance costs. If a fault occurs, it will cause serious damage to the entire equipment and can even have a major impact on the entire production process, leading to a serious economic and social life. In this paper, a CNN-based machine learning fault diagnosis method is proposed to address the problem of high incidence of motor faults and difficulty in identifying fault types. A fault reproduction test is constructed by machine learning techniques to extract vibration time domain data for normal operating conditions, rotor eccentricity, stator short circuit, and bearing inner ring fault; divide the data segment into 15 speed segments, extract 13 typical time domain features for each speed segment; and perform mathematical statistics for fault diagnosis. Compared with the traditional algorithm, the method has more comprehensive feature information extraction, higher diagnostic accuracy, and faster diagnostic speed, with a fault diagnosis accuracy of 98.7%.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningElectricityElectronicsHumansInformation Storage and Retrieval

Identifiers

PMID36105635
PMCPMC9467767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.