Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36105632›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

A Computational Neural Network Model for College English Grammar Correction.

Xingjie Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Xingjie WuSchool of General Caliber-oriented Education, Wuchang University of Technology, Wuhan 430000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7157-9836

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For the error correction of English grammar, if there are errors in the semantic units (words and sentences), it will inevitably affect the subsequent text analysis and semantic understanding, and ultimately reduce the overall performance of the practical application system. Therefore, intelligent error detection and correction of the word and grammatical errors in English texts is one of the key and difficult points of natural language processing. This exploration innovatively combines a computational neural model with college grammar error correction to improve the accuracy of college grammar error correction. It studies the computational neural model in English grammar error correction based on a neural network named Knowledge and Neural machine translation powered College English Grammar Typo Correction (KNGTC). First, the Recurrent Neural Network is introduced, and the overall structure of the English grammatical error correction neural model is constructed. Moreover, the supervised training of Attention is discussed, and the experimental environment and experimental data are given. The results show that KNGTC has high accuracy in college English grammar correction, and the accuracy of this model in CET-4 and CET-6 writing can reach 82.69%. The English grammar error correction model based on the computational neural network has perfect function and strong error correction ability. The optimization and perfection of the model can improve students' English grammar level, which has certain practical value. After years of continuous optimization and improvement, English grammar error correction technology has entered a performance bottleneck. This mode's construction can break the current technology's limitations and bring a better user experience. Therefore, it is very valuable to study the error correction model of English grammar in practical application.

Indexed as

LanguageLinguisticsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerSemanticsUniversities

Identifiers

PMID36105632
PMCPMC9467766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.