Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36105607›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022

Glycerol amendment enhances biosulfidogenesis in acid mine drainage-affected areas: An incubation column experiment.

A M Ilin, C M van der Graaf, I Yusta, A Sorrentino, I Sánchez-Andrea, J Sánchez-España

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

A M IlinDepartment of Geology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Barrio Sarriena s/n, Leioa, Spain.
C M van der GraafLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University (WUR), Wageningen, Netherlands.
I YustaDepartment of Geology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Barrio Sarriena s/n, Leioa, Spain.
A SorrentinoALBA Synchrotron Light Source, Cerdanyola del Vallés, Barcelona, Spain.
I Sánchez-AndreaLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University (WUR), Wageningen, Netherlands.
J Sánchez-EspañaMine Wastes and Environmental Geochemistry Research Group, Department of Geological Resources for the Ecological Transition, (CN IGME-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
University of the Basque Country · ESWageningen University & Research · NLALBA Synchrotron (Spain) · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial sulfate (SO

Indexed as

acid mine drainage (AMD)bioremediationbiosulfidogenesisDesulfosporosinusincubation columnmetal sulfide neoformationmine tailingssulfate-reducing bacteria

Identifiers

PMID36105607
PMCPMC9464833
OpenAlexW4293797243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.