Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36105548›Full record

ReviewSAGE open medicine2022

Clinical challenges in diagnosis and treatment of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis.

Chemen M Neal, Mark G Martens

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in SAGE open medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. 'It's not just thrush, it's recurrent thrush': a qualitative study of patient and clinician perspectives on diagnosing recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  3. The Gut-Vagina Axis.Microorganisms · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. State-of-the-Art Review: Managing Vulvovaginal Candidiasis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Non-Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Innovative simvastatin-loaded emulgel effectively treats vulvovaginal candidiasis: in vivo efficacy and in vitro biopharmaceutical analysis.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Comparative analysis of two immunosuppression protocols for vulvovaginal candidiasis induction in Wistar rats.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. New insights in the role ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chemen M NealDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Mark G MartensDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mohawk Valley Health System, Utica, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3290-6179
Indiana University School of MedicineValley Health System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vulvovaginal candidiasis is a common infection associated most often with the overgrowth of the fungal species

Indexed as

antifungalsCandidadiagnosisguidelinesRecurrent vulvovaginal candidiasistreatment

Identifiers

PMID36105548
PMCPMC9465564
OpenAlexW4295903887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.