Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36105538›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in big data2022

Lessons learned: A neuroimaging research center's transition to open and reproducible science.

Keith A Bush, Maegan L Calvert, Clinton D Kilts

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in big data, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Keith A BushDepartment of Psychiatry, Brain Imaging Research Center, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.
Maegan L CalvertDepartment of Psychiatry, Brain Imaging Research Center, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.
Clinton D KiltsDepartment of Psychiatry, Brain Imaging Research Center, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · US

Funding

Translational Training in AddictionT32DA022981 · NIDA · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI Melissa Jean Zielinski · 2009 to 2026
$6.1M
The Sex-specific Roles and Neural Processing Correlates of Future Outcome Estimation in the Drug Addiction ProcessR01DA044608 · NIDA · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI JAMES, GEORGE ANDREW · 2018 to 2022
$2.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA044608NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA022981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human functional neuroimaging has evolved dramatically in recent years, driven by increased technical complexity and emerging evidence that functional neuroimaging findings are not generally reproducible. In response to these trends, neuroimaging scientists have developed principles, practices, and tools to both manage this complexity as well as to enhance the rigor and reproducibility of neuroimaging science. We group these best practices under four categories: experiment pre-registration, FAIR data principles, reproducible neuroimaging analyses, and open science. While there is growing recognition of the need to implement these best practices there exists little practical guidance of how to accomplish this goal. In this work, we describe lessons learned from efforts to adopt these best practices within the Brain Imaging Research Center at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences over 4 years (July 2018-May 2022). We provide a brief summary of the four categories of best practices. We then describe our center's scientific workflow (from hypothesis formulation to result reporting) and detail how each element of this workflow maps onto these four categories. We also provide specific examples of practices or tools that support this mapping process. Finally, we offer a roadmap for the stepwise adoption of these practices, providing recommendations of why and what to do as well as a summary of cost-benefit tradeoffs for each step of the transition.

Indexed as

FAIRneuroimagingopen sciencepreregistrationreproducible neuroimagingtransition

Identifiers

PMID36105538
PMCPMC9464934
OpenAlexW4293420306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.