ArticleContrast media & molecular imaging2022
Comparison of Hepatectomy and Hemangiomas Stripping on Patients with Giant Hepatic Hemangiomas.
Article in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A report of 12 cases of congenital hepatic hemangioma and literature review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Colorectal liver metastases patients prognostic assessment: prospects and limits of radiomics and radiogenomics.Infectious agents and cancer · 2023Review
- Retracted: Comparison of Hepatectomy and Hemangiomas Stripping on Patients with Giant Hepatic Hemangiomas.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-11-29Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare the value of a hepatectomy and hemangioma stripping on patients with giant hepatic hemangiomas. Methods: Seventy-four patients with giant hepatic hemangiomas were retrospectively analyzed from data collected from their hepatobiliary surgeries performed from June 2010 to June 2015 at the People's Hospital of Ningxia and the general hospital affiliated with Ningxia Medical University. The patients were divided into a hepatectomy group (37 patients) and a hemangioma-stripping group (37 patients). Conditions of each group were compared before and after surgery and comprised of surgery duration, intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion, duration of hepatic blood occlusion, and hospital stay. Any complications after surgery, such as pleural effusions, bile leakage, and abdominal hemorrhage, were also observed. Results: In the hemangioma-stripping group, the surgery time was 2.38 ± 0.93 h, intraoperative blood loss was 889.19 ± 756.37, blood transfusion amount was 723.78 ± 801.14, the duration of hepatic blood occlusion 26.84 ± 17.30 min, and hospital stay was 16.19 ± 5.01 d. In the hepatectomy group, surgery time was 3.26 ± 1.16 h, intraoperative blood loss was 1551.35 ± 1755.88 mL blood transfusion amount was 1693.24 ± 2117.72 mL, duration of hepatic blood occlusion was 26.84 ± 17.30 min, and hospital stay was 16.19 ± 5.01 d. The difference between the groups was statistically significant ( Conclusions: Hemangiomas stripping is an effective method by which to cure hepatic hemangioma, with the advantages being a relatively easy surgery with less patient trauma, rapid recovery, and fewer complications. This method should be used more often in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.