ArticleContrast media & molecular imaging2022
Investigation of the Clinical Application Value of HR-HPV DNA Combined with Liquid Based Cytology in Colposcopy of Cervical Cancer.
Article in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic value and clinical significance of serum miR-4534 combined with transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound in cervical cancer.Discover oncology · 2024Article
- Value of high‑risk human papillomavirus detection combined with colposcopy in the diagnosis of cervical cancer and precancerous lesions.Oncology letters · 2024Article
- Clinical efficacy of recombinant human interferon α-2b gel combined with LEEP conization in treating cervical intraepithelial neoplasia with comorbid high-risk HPV infection.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Article
- Retracted: Investigation of the Clinical Application Value of HR-HPV DNA Combined with Liquid Based Cytology in Colposcopy of Cervical Cancer.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-09-27Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Informed/Patient Consent - None/Withdrawn · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/64E009AB136602FD3D1736F0C8D2CB
- Retracted
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to investigate the clinical application value of HR-HPV DNA combined with liquid-based cytology in colposcopy of cervical cancer, a retrospective analysis is performed on 428 patients who underwent a cervical pathological examination in our hospital from May 2020 to December 2021. The pathological biopsy results are used as the gold standard to determine whether cervical lesions occurred in patients, and patients with positive gold standard results are included in the study group. The positive rates of liquid-based cytology and HR-HPV DNA are observed and recorded, and the patients with negative gold standard results are used as the control group. The positive rate of HR-HPV DNA and liquid-based cytology will increase with the aggravation of pathological results. The ROC curve shows that HR-HPV DNA combined with liquid-based cytology has high diagnostic efficiency in colposcopy of cervical lesions. It is clearly evident that both liquid-based cytology and HR-HPV DNA tests have certain advantages in the screening of cervical lesions, and the combined detection can further improve the screening value of cervical lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.