ArticleContrast media & molecular imaging2022
Clinical Characteristics and Gene Mutation Analysis of Poststroke Epilepsy.
Article in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applications for Deep Learning in Epilepsy Genetic Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Deep Learning Aided Neuroimaging and Brain Regulation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Retracted: Clinical Characteristics and Gene Mutation Analysis of Poststroke Epilepsy.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-07-19Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Informed/Patient Consent - None/Withdrawn · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/C14272C3CAB122414D27A19ED78643
- Retracted
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epilepsy is one of the most common brain disorders worldwide. Poststroke epilepsy (PSE) affects functional retrieval after stroke and brings considerable social values. A stroke occurs when the blood circulation to the brain fails, causing speech difficulties, memory loss, and paralysis. An electroencephalogram (EEG) is a tool that may detect anomalies in brain electrical activity, including those induced by a stroke. Using EEG data to determine the electrical action in the brains of stroke patients is an effort to measure therapy. Hence in this paper, deep learning assisted gene mutation analysis (DL-GMA) was utilized for classifying poststroke epilepsy in patients. This study suggested a model categorizing poststroke patients based on EEG signals that utilized wavelet, long short-term memory (LSTM), and convolutional neural networks (CNN). Gene mutation analysis can help determine the cause of an individual's epilepsy, leading to an accurate diagnosis and the best probable medical management. The test outcomes show the viability of noninvasive approaches that quickly evaluate brain waves to monitor and detect daily stroke diseases. The simulation outcomes demonstrate that the proposed GL-GMA achieves a high accuracy ratio of 98.3%, a prediction ratio of 97.8%, a precision ratio of 96.5%, and a recall ratio of 95.6% and decreases the error rate 10.3% compared to other existing methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.