Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36105410›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2022

Outcome of giant pituitary tumors requiring surgery.

Stephan Gaillard, Sosthène Adeniran, Chiara Villa, Anne Jouinot, Marie-Laure Raffin-Sanson, Loic Feuvret, Pierre Verrelle, Fidéline Bonnet, Anthony Dohan, Jérôme Bertherat and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Grading and staging for pituitary neuroendocrine tumors.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Stephan GaillardDepartment of Neurosurgery, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, La Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France.
Sosthène AdeniranDepartment of Neurosurgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Yalgado Ouédraogo University Hospital, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Chiara VillaUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Cochin, CNRS, INSERM, Paris, France.
Anne JouinotUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Cochin, CNRS, INSERM, Paris, France.
Marie-Laure Raffin-SansonDepartment of Endocrinology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne Billancourt, France.
Loic FeuvretRadiation Oncology Department, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, La Pitié-Salpétrière University Hospital, Paris, France.
Pierre VerrelleRadiation Oncology Department, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Fidéline BonnetUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Cochin, CNRS, INSERM, Paris, France.
Anthony DohanDepartment of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France.
Jérôme BertheratUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Cochin, CNRS, INSERM, Paris, France.
Guillaume AssiéUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Cochin, CNRS, INSERM, Paris, France.
Bertrand BaussartDepartment of Neurosurgery, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, La Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France.
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRHôpital Cochin · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Yalgado Ouédraogo · BFInserm · FRInstitut Cochin · FRParisTech · FRSorbonne Université · FRUniversité Clermont Auvergne · FRUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The management of giant pituitary tumors is complex, with few publications and recommendations. Consequently, patient's care mainly relies on clinical experience. We report here a first large series of patients with giant pituitary tumors managed by a multidisciplinary expert team, focusing on treatments and outcome. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Giant pituitary tumors were defined by a main diameter > 40mm. Macroprolactinomas sensitive to dopamine agonists were excluded. All patients were operated by a single neurosurgical team. After surgery, multimodal management was proposed, including hormone replacement, radiotherapy and anti-tumor medical therapies. Outcome was modeled using Kaplan-Meyer representation. A logistic regression model was built to identify the risk factors associated with surgical complications. Results: 63 consecutive patients presented a giant adenoma, most often with visual defects. Patients were operated once, twice or three times in 59%, 40% and 1% of cases respectively, mainly through endoscopic endonasal approach. Giant adenomas included gonadotroph, corticotroph, somatotroph, lactotroph and mixed GH-PRL subtypes in 67%, 14%, 11%, 6% and 2% of patients respectively. Vision improved in 89% of patients with prior visual defects. Severe surgical complications occurred in 11% of patients, mainly for tumors > 50 mm requiring microscopic transcranial approach. Additional radiotherapy was needed for 29% of patients, 3 to 56 months after first surgery. For 6% of patients, Temozolomide treatment was required, 19 to 66 months after first surgery. Conclusions: Giant pituitary tumors require multimodal management, with a central role of surgery. Most often, tumor control can be achieved by expert multidisciplinary teams.

Indexed as

AdenomaPituitary NeoplasmsHumansNeurosurgical ProceduresRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomeadenomaaggressivenesscomplicationgiant pituitary tumorradiotherapysurgery

Identifiers

PMID36105410
PMCPMC9465329
OpenAlexW4293426819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.