Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36105268›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer (Dove Medical Press)2022

Breast Cancer Subtypes and Prognosis: Answers to Subgroup Classification Questions, Identifying the Worst Subgroup in Our Single-Center Series.

Rusen Cosar, Necdet Sut, Alaattin Ozen, Ebru Tastekin, Sernaz Topaloglu, Irfan Cicin, Dilek Nurlu, Talar Ozler, Seda Demir, Gokay Yıldız and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Association of Post-Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy MRI andDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Curcumin Administration Routes in Breast Cancer Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Transcriptomics analyses reveal the effects of Pentagamaboronon-0-ol on PI3K/Akt and cell cycle of HER2+ breast cancer cells.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rusen CosarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Trakya University Faculty of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-7953-8887
Necdet SutDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics Trakya University Medical Faculty, Edirne, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-6678-482X
Alaattin OzenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Eskisehir University Faculty of Medicine, Eskisehir, Turkey.
Ebru TastekinDepartment of Pathology, Trakya University Faculty of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey.
Sernaz TopalogluDepartment of Medical Oncology, Trakya University Faculty of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey.
Irfan CicinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Trakya University Faculty of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey.
Dilek NurluDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Trakya University Faculty of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey.
Talar OzlerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Trakya University Faculty of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey.
Seda DemirDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Trakya University Faculty of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey.
Gokay YıldızDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Trakya University Faculty of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-6248-6403
Eylül ŞenödeyiciTrakya University Faculty of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-4132-1594
Mustafa Cem UzalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul Arel University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Trakya University · TREskişehir City Hospital · TRIstanbul Arel University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Many studies report the triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) as the worst subgroup, as such patients do not benefit from anti-hormonal therapy and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) antagonists. While HER2 overexpression was a poor prognostic factor in breast cancer before trastuzumab (Herceptin) was available, TNBC is often reported as the worst BC subgroup since targeted therapy is currently not possible. Since the patience-specific experiences and the current literature did not always align, we aimed to determine the BC subgroup with the shortest survival in our center. Methods: The records of patients with BC who were admitted to Trakya University Faculty of Medicine Department of Medical and Radiation Oncology between July 1999 and December 2019 were reviewed. Patients were divided into four main groups (Luminal A, Luminal B, TNBC, and HER2-enriched) according to the St Gallen International Consensus Panel and four subgroups in accordance with estrogen receptor, progestin receptor and HER2 positivity. Patient characteristics, treatment characteristics and clinical outcomes of the four main subgroups were evaluated. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the significance of survival differences among the selected variables was compared by using the Log rank test. Factors affecting disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by Cox regression analysis. Results: Statistical analysis was performed on 2017 patients, after excluding patients with phyllodes tumor, carcinoma-in-situ and missing information from a total of 2474 patients with BC. There were 952 (47.1%) patients in the Luminal A group, 236 (34.1%) in the Luminal B group, 236 (11.7%) in the TNBC group and 142 (7.1%) patients in the HER2 enriched group. HER2-enriched patients had the shortest survival (p < 0.001), with 113.70 ± 7.17 months of DFS and 125.45 ± 3.03 months of OS. For patients who received Herceptin, DFS was 101.50 ± 6.4 months and OS was 118.14 ± 6.16. Patients who did not receive Herceptin had 92.79 ± 18 months of DFS and 94.44 ± 15.23 months of OS. Conclusion: The HER2-enriched subgroup had the worst prognosis despite receiving targeted therapy. While the duration of DFS and OS had no significant difference between TNBC and Luminal A-B subgroups, HER2 enriched subgroup had significantly shorter survival when compared to any other subgroup. HER2-enriched subgroup had a 10-fold greater risk of death compared to the Luminal A subgroup.

Indexed as

breast cancerHER2 enriched subgroupLuminal-A breast cancerLuminal-B breast cancersubgroup in breast cancertriple negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID36105268
PMCPMC9467695
OpenAlexW4294904496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.