Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36104993›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedics

Current understanding on artificial intelligence and machine learning in orthopaedics - A scoping review.

Vishal Kumar, Sandeep Patel, Vishnu Baburaj, Aditya Vardhan, Prasoon Kumar Singh, Raju Vaishya

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Artificial intelligence-based orthopaedic perpetual design.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vishal KumarDepartment of Orthopaedics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Sandeep PatelDepartment of Orthopaedics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Vishnu BaburajDepartment of Orthopaedics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Aditya VardhanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Prasoon Kumar SinghDepartment of Orthopaedics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Raju VaishyaIndraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Artificial Intelligence (AI) has improved the way of looking at technological challenges. Today, we can afford to see many of the problems as just an input-output system rather than solving from the first principles. The field of Orthopaedics is not spared from this rapidly expanding technology. The recent surge in the use of AI can be attributed mainly to advancements in deep learning methodologies and computing resources. This review was conducted to draw an outline on the role of AI in orthopaedics. Methods: We developed a search strategy and looked for articles on PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE. A total of 40 articles were selected for this study, from tools for medical aid like imaging solutions, implant management, and robotic surgery to understanding scientific questions. Results: A total of 40 studies have been included in this review. The role of AI in the various subspecialties such as arthroplasty, trauma, orthopaedic oncology, foot and ankle etc. have been discussed in detail. Conclusion: AI has touched most of the aspects of Orthopaedics. The increase in technological literacy, data management plans, and hardware systems, amalgamated with the access to hand-held devices like mobiles, and electronic pads, augur well for the exciting times ahead in this field. We have discussed various technological breakthroughs in AI that have been able to perform in Orthopaedics, and also the limitations and the problem with the black-box approach of modern AI algorithms. We advocate for better interpretable algorithms which can help both the patients and surgeons alike.

Indexed as

ArthroplastyArtificial intelligenceDeep learningMachine learningOrthopaedicsTrauma

Identifiers

PMID36104993
PMCPMC9465367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.