ArticleProblemy endokrinologii2022
[Androgenic status in men during COVID-19].
Article in Problemy endokrinologii, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCOVID-19 is a disease that has a negative systemic effect on the human body, including the male gonads. Therefore, the androgenic status in men with COVID-19 needs to be studied.
aimTo evaluate the levels of total testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) and free testosterone in men in the acute phase of COVID-19 and during convalescence. MATERIALS AND
methodsA continuous dynamic prospective study of 70 men with moderate to severe COVID-19 at the age of 50[44; 64] years. During the study, the levels of total testosterone, SHBG were determined with further calculation of the level of free testosterone by Vermeullen. The data were collected twice - at the patient's hospitalization and at his discharge. The differences between the groups were considered statistically significant at p <0.05.
resultsAt the time of hospitalization for COVID-19, hypogonadism syndrome was observed in 61 people - 87%. Patients with hypogonadism did not statistically significant differ in age and severity of COVID-19 disease compared to men without hypogonadism. Inpatient treatment lasting 12[10;14] days resulted in a statistically significant increase in the levels of total testosterone from 4,7[2,96;8,48] to 12,85[8,62;19,2] nmol/l, p<0,001; SHBG from 27,87[20,78;36,57] to 33,76[26,27;52,60] nmol/l, p<0,001 and free testosterone from 107[65;174] to 235[162;337] pmol/l, p<0,001. This led to the elimination of hypogonadism in 28 patients - 40%. Patients with persistent hypogonadism were statistically significantly older than men with normalized testosterone, there were no statistically significant differences in the initial levels of total testosterone, SHBG and free testosterone, and there were also no differences in the prevalence of severe COVID-19 (3,97[2,86;7,46] vs 4,26[2,93;5,96] nmol/l, p=0,100; 28,76[20,78;48,59] vs 24,63[18,85;31,70] nmol/l, р=0,994; 100[58;118] vs 96[64;143] pmol/l, p=0,522; 24 против 18%, p=0,754, respectively).
conclusionCOVID-19 has a pronounced negative effect on the production of testosterone in men, leading to the development of laboratoric hypogonadism, which is potentially reversible. The reversibility of laboratoric hypogonadism is typical for younger patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.