Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36104927›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2023

Quantitative impact of pre-analytical process on plasma uracil when testing for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency.

Maud Maillard, Manon Launay, Bernard Royer, Jérôme Guitton, Elodie Gautier-Veyret, Sophie Broutin, Camille Tron, Félicien Le Louedec, Joseph Ciccolini, Damien Richard and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Fluoropyrimidine-induced cardiotoxicity: outcomes and safety of chemotherapy reintroduction in a retrospective cohort study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Maud MaillardLaboratoire de Pharmacologie, Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole et Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse, Inserm UMR1037, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Manon LaunayLaboratoire de Pharmacologie et Toxicologie, CHU de Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3113-7301
Bernard RoyerLaboratoire de Pharmacologie Clinique et Toxicologie, CHU Besançon and Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, INSERM, EFS BFC, UMR1098, Interactions Hôte-Greffon-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire et Génique, Besançon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1379-858X
Jérôme GuittonLaboratoire de Pharmacologie Toxicologie, CHU de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Elodie Gautier-VeyretLaboratoire de Pharmacologie, Pharmacogénétique et Toxicologie, CHU Grenoble-Alpes et Université Grenoble-Alpes, laboratoire HP2, INSERM U1300, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5846-3847
Sophie BroutinDépartement de Biologie et Pathologie Médicale, Service de Pharmacologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Camille TronLaboratoire de pharmacologie CHU de Rennes, Université de Rennes, CHU de Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail), UMR_S 1085, Rennes, France.
Félicien Le LouedecLaboratoire de Pharmacologie, Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole et Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse, Inserm UMR1037, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Joseph CiccoliniSMARTc Unit, CRCM Inserm U1068 et Laboratoire de Pharmacocinétique, CHU La Timone, Marseille, France.
Damien RichardLaboratoire de Pharmacologie et Toxicologie, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Hugo AlarcanService de Biochimie et Biologie Moléculaire, CHRU de Tours, Tours, France.
Vincent HaufroidLouvain Centre for Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology (LTAP), Clinical and Experimental Research Institute (IREC), Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Naïma TafziINSERM, Université de Limoge, Service de Pharmacologie et Toxicologie, CHU de Limogess, U1248 IPPRITT, Limoges, France.
Antonin SchmittService Pharmacie, Centre Georges-François Leclerc et INSERM U1231, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3132-7730
Marie-Christine Etienne-GrimaldiLaboratoire d'Oncopharmacologie, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France.
Céline NarjozAssistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, Service de biochimie, Paris, France.
Fabienne ThomasLaboratoire de Pharmacologie, Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole et Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse, Inserm UMR1037, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9886-412X
Groupe de Pharmacologie Clinique Oncologique (GPCO)
Inserm · FRUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FRCentre Antoine Lacassagne · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours · FRCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEHôpital Européen · FRInstitut Gustave Roussy · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsDetermining dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity by measuring patient's uracil (U) plasma concentration is mandatory before fluoropyrimidine (FP) administration in France. In this study, we aimed to refine the pre-analytical recommendations for determining U and dihydrouracil (UH

methodsU and UH

resultsStorage of blood samples before centrifugation at room temperature (RT) should not exceed 1 h, whereas cold (+4°C) storage maintains the stability of uracil after 5 hours. For patients correctly double sampled, IOV of U reached 22.4% for U (SD = 17.9%, range = 0-99%). Notably, 17% of them were assigned with a different phenotype (normal or DPD-deficient) based on the analysis of their two samples. For those having at least one non-compliant sample, this percentage increased up to 33.8%. The moment of blood collection did not affect the DPD phenotyping result.

conclusionCaution should be taken when interpreting U concentrations if the time before centrifugation exceeds 1 hour at RT, since it rises significantly afterwards. Not respecting the pre-analytical conditions for DPD phenotyping increases the risk of DPD status misclassification.

Indexed as

Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase DeficiencyDihydrouracil Dehydrogenase (NADP)FluorouracilHumansPhenotypePlasmaUracilDihydrouracil Dehydrogenase (NADP)FluorouracilUracildihydropyrimidine dehydrogenasedihydrouracilintra-individual variabilitypre-analytical practicesuracil

Identifiers

PMID36104927
PMCPMC10092089
OpenAlexW4295903340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.