Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36104833›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2022

Photobiomodulation in 3D tissue engineering.

Polina Bikmulina, Nastasia Kosheleva, Anastasia Shpichka, Vladimir Yusupov, Vladimir Gogvadze, Yury Rochev, Peter Timashev

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Photobiomodulation in Promoting Cartilage Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Combined Light and Thermal Stimulation of Bone Marrow Stem Cells.Journal of lasers in medical sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Polina BikmulinaSechenov First Moscow State Medical University, World-Class Research Center "Digital Biodesign and Personalized Healthcare", Moscow, Russia, Russia.
Nastasia KoshelevaSechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Moscow, Russia, Russia.
Anastasia ShpichkaSechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Moscow, Russia, Russia.
Vladimir YusupovInstitute of Photon Technologies of FSRC "Crystallography and Photonics" RAS, Troitsk, Russia, Russia.
Vladimir GogvadzeLomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Medicine, Moscow, Russia, Russia.
Yury RochevNational University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland, Ireland.
Peter TimashevSechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Moscow, Russia, Russia.
Sechenov University · RUFederal Scientific Research Centre Crystallography and Photonics · RULomonosov Moscow State University · RUOllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IEResearch Institute of General Pathology and Pathophysiology, the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

significanceThe method of photobiomodulation (PBM) has been used in medicine for a long time to promote anti-inflammation and pain-resolving processes in different organs and tissues. PBM triggers numerous cellular pathways including stimulation of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, alteration of the cytoskeleton, cell death prevention, increasing proliferative activity, and directing cell differentiation. The most effective wavelengths for PBM are found within the optical window (750 to 1100 nm), in which light can permeate tissues and other water-containing structures to depths of up to a few cm. PBM already finds its applications in the developing fields of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. However, the diversity of three-dimensional (3D) systems, irradiation sources, and protocols intricate the PBM applications.

aimWe aim to discuss the PBM and 3D tissue engineered constructs to define the fields of interest for PBM applications in tissue engineering. APPROACH: First, we provide a brief overview of PBM and the timeline of its development. Then, we discuss the optical properties of 3D cultivation systems and important points of light dosimetry. Finally, we analyze the cellular pathways induced by PBM and outcomes observed in various 3D tissue-engineered constructs: hydrogels, scaffolds, spheroids, cell sheets, bioprinted structures, and organoids.

resultsOur summarized results demonstrate the great potential of PBM in the stimulation of the cell survival and viability in 3D conditions. The strategies to achieve different cell physiology states with particular PBM parameters are outlined.

conclusionsPBM has already proved itself as a convenient and effective tool to prevent drastic cellular events in the stress conditions. Because of the poor viability of cells in scaffolds and the convenience of PBM devices, 3D tissue engineering is a perspective field for PBM applications.

Indexed as

HydrogelsTissue EngineeringCell DifferentiationCell SurvivalHydrogelslow-level lightphotobiomodulationregenerative medicinetissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID36104833
PMCPMC9473299
OpenAlexW4295681849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.