ArticleImplementation science communications2022
Development of a qualitative data analysis codebook informed by the i-PARIHS framework.
Article in Implementation science communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Balanced informational feedback as part of an implementation/deimplementation bundle to support deimplementation efforts in antimicrobial stewardship: results from a mixed methods, hybrid type III implementation/effectiveness trial.Frontiers in public health · 2026Trial
- Rollout of a care bundle for intracerebral haemorrhage across the North of England: a qualitative study.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- Diet and ileostomy: a qualitative comparison of patient and healthcare professional perspectives in the United Kingdom and Australia.European journal of nutrition · 2026Article
- Provider and leadership attitudes toward telemental health at sites with high levels of video, phone, and in-person care: A qualitative analysis.Psychological services · 2026Article
- Enablers and Barriers to the Implementation of the Allied Health Rural Generalist Education and Training Scheme in Rural and Remote Private and Non-Government Contexts in Australia.The Australian journal of rural health · 2026Article
- Identifying Implementation Needs and Developing Strategies to Optimize Integration of Patient Priorities Care in Primary Care: A Qualitative Formative Evaluation of Two Study Sites.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Prospective Preference Assessment of Potential Participants in the Perioperative Rectal Methadone in Spine Surgery (PROMISE) Trial.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2026Article
- Hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation studies: why and how to do them.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Use of the i-PARIHS framework in nutrition and dietetics research and practice: A citation analysis of the literature and case studies.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2025Review
- First-line managers' experience of guideline implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Article
- Implementation Strategies Applied in Communities Matching Process (ISAC Match): Expanded Guidance and Case Study.Implementation science : IS · 2025Article
- Understanding the acute care context to inform palliative care improvements: a qualitative study of hospital-based multidisciplinary clinicians.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- How can a community of practice support healthcare professionals navigating new roles? a case study of genetic counsellors employed to work in medical specialities.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Learn@Lunch: Developing a continuing professional development programme to raise knowledge and awareness of drinking alcohol as an occupation in later life.The British journal of occupational therapy · 2025Article
- Advancing implementation science in community settings: the implementation strategies applied in communities (ISAC) compilation.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2024Article
- Getting to Fidelity: Consensus Development Process to Identify Core Activities of Implementation Facilitation.Global implementation research and applications · 2024Article
- Sustaining the collaborative chronic care model in outpatient mental health: a matrixed multiple case study.Implementation science : IS · 2024Article
- Vendors' Perceptions and Experiences with WIC Online Shopping Implementation.Current developments in nutrition · 2024Article
- Article
- Facilitators and barriers to implementing a specialized care unit for persons with cognitive impairment in an acute geriatric hospital: a process evaluation.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Integrated-Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework and its predecessor, PARIHS, have been widely utilized in implementation studies. Although i-PARIHS developers have focused on creating tools to guide facilitators in its application in practice, tools are also needed for evaluation and research. Codebooks with clear and meaningful code labels and definitions are an important component of qualitative data analysis and have been developed for other widely used frameworks. There is no such codebook for i-PARIHS. Additionally, sub-constructs for the Innovation, Recipients, and Context constructs lack definitions, and there is no sub-classification of facilitation activities for the Facilitation construct. The lack of a standardized codebook hinders our ability to synthesize research findings across studies, explore and test the range of activities that are utilized in facilitation efforts, and potentially validate and further refine i-PARIHS. This paper describes a rigorous process of developing a detailed qualitative codebook informed by the i-PARIHS framework.
methodsA workgroup of qualitative researchers conducted a rigorous four-phase process to develop a codebook informed by i-PARIHS. In phase 1, workgroup members reviewed and discussed literature, consulted an organizational scientist, and drafted and refined subcodes and definitions for i-PARIHS constructs. In phase 2, they obtained feedback from an expert panel and further refined subcodes and definitions. In phase 3, they obtained feedback from i-PARIHS developers/experts and incorporated it into the codebook. Finally, two studies piloted the application of the codebook which informed the final version.
resultsThe resulting i-PARIHS-informed codebook includes definitions for the four main constructs of the framework: Innovation, Recipients, Context, and Facilitation; subcodes and definitions for characteristics of each of these constructs; and instructions for the suggested application of individual codes and use of the codebook generally.
conclusionsThe standardized codes and definitions in the codebook can facilitate data exploration, pattern identification, and insight development informed by the i-PARIHS framework. Qualitative analysts can also use them to explore interactions between i-PARIHS constructs, maximize the potential for comparing findings across studies, and support the refinement of the i-PARIHS framework using empirical findings from multiple studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.