ArticleGenome biology2022
Comprehensive and scalable quantification of splicing differences with MntJULiP.
Article in Genome biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- SpliSync: Genomic language model-driven splice site correction of long RNA sequencing reads.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Distinct genetic architecture of gene and isoform level QTL in the Diversity Outbred (DO) mouse population.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- hStouffer: the enhanced meta-analysis method for the comprehensive analysis of large-scale RNA-seq data.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- MntJULiP and Jutils: differential splicing analysis of RNA-seq data with covariates.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Multimodal genome-wide survey of progressing and non-progressing breast ductal carcinoma in-situ.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2024Article
- Comprehensive and scalable quantification of splicing differences with MntJULiP.Genome biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tools for differential splicing detection have failed to provide a comprehensive and consistent view of splicing variation. We present MntJULiP, a novel method for comprehensive and accurate quantification of splicing differences between two or more conditions. MntJULiP detects both changes in intron splicing ratios and changes in absolute splicing levels with high accuracy, and can find classes of variation overlooked by other tools. MntJULiP identifies over 29,000 differentially spliced introns in 1398 GTEx brain samples, including 11,242 novel introns discovered in this dataset. Highly scalable, MntJULiP can process thousands of samples within hours to reveal splicing constituents of phenotypic differentiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.