ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2022
The validity and reliability of the OneStep smartphone application under various gait conditions in healthy adults with feasibility in clinical practice.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smartphone-Based Gait Assessment Captures Functional Recovery Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- MoveLabSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Extraction of Clinically Relevant Temporal Gait Parameters from IMU Sensors Mimicking the Use of Smartphones.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Validity and Reliability of a Smartphone-Based Gait Assessment in Measuring Temporal Gait Parameters: Challenges and Recommendations.Biosensors · 2025Article
- Psychometric Characteristics of Smartphone-Based Gait Analyses in Chronic Health Conditions: A Systematic Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Review
- Evaluation of Smartphone Technology on Spatiotemporal Gait in Older and Diseased Adult Populations.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Sensor-Based Gait and Balance Assessment in Healthy Adults: Analysis of Short-Term Training and Sensor Placement Effects.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The Reliability and Validity of the OneStep Smartphone Application for Gait Analysis among Patients Undergoing Rehabilitation for Unilateral Lower Limb Disability.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Reliability of a Smartphone App to Objectively Monitor Performance Outcomes in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Observational Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Influence of Sex on Cognitive and Motor Dual-Task Performance Among Young Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2024Article
- Validity and Reliability of a Smartphone Application for Home Measurement of Four-Meter Gait Speed in Older Adults.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Mobile and Computer-Based Applications for Rehabilitation Monitoring and Self-Management After Knee Arthroplasty: Scoping Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2024Article
- A Scoping Review of the Validity and Reliability of Smartphone Accelerometers When Collecting Kinematic Gait Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Validity and reliability of the Apple Health app on iPhone for measuring gait parameters in children, adults, and seniors.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Spatiotemporal parameters from remote smartphone-based gait analysis are associated with lower extremity functional scale categories.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePrimary purpose of this study was to determine the validity and reliability of the OneStep smartphone application in healthy adults. Secondary purpose was to determine the feasibility of measuring gait dysfunction, limitation in spatiotemporal characteristics, longitudinally in patients following total hip or knee arthroplasty.
methodsFirst objective, 20 healthy adults (mean age, 42.3 ± 19.7 years; 60% males; mean body mass index, 29.0 ± 5.2 kg/m
resultsThe smartphone application demonstrated moderate-to-excellent intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability between-system (ICC range, 0.56-0.99), -limb (ICC range, 0.62-0.99) and -device (ICC range, 0.61-0.96) for gait analysis of healthy adults. Pearson correlations were low-to-very high between methods (r range, 0.45-0.99). Bland-Altman analysis revealed relative underestimation of spatiotemporal variables by the smartphone application compared to the motion system. For patients following total hip or knee arthroplasty, gait analysis using the OneStep application demonstrated significant improvement (p < 0.001, Cohen's d > 0.95) in gait dysfunction between 2- and 10 weeks postoperatively.
conclusionThe smartphone application can be a valid, reliable and feasible alternative to motion laboratories in evaluating deficits in gait dysfunction in various environments and clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.