ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2023
Contribution of Shape Features to Intradiscal Pressure and Facets Contact Pressure in L4/L5 FSUs: An In-Silico Study.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Main elements of current spine biomechanics research: model, installation and test data.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Finite element models (FEMs) of the spine commonly use a limited number of simplified geometries. Nevertheless, the geometric features of the spine are important in determining its FEM outcomes. The link between a spinal segment's shape and its biomechanical response has been studied, but the co-variances of the shape features have been omitted. We used a principal component (PCA)-based statistical shape modelling (SSM) approach to investigate the contribution of shape features to the intradiscal pressure (IDP) and the facets contact pressure (FCP) in a cohort of synthetic L4/L5 functional spinal units under axial compression. We quantified the uncertainty in the FEM results, and the contribution of individual shape modes to these results. This parameterisation approach is able to capture the variability in the correlated anatomical features in a real population and sample plausible synthetic geometries. The first shape mode ([Formula: see text]) explained 22.6% of the shape variation in the subject-specific cohort used to train the SSM, and had the largest correlation with, and contribution to IDP (17%) and FCP (11%). The largest geometric variation in ([Formula: see text]) was in the annulus-nucleus ratio.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.