ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2022
Evaluation of sample processing methods to improve the detection of Bacillus anthracis in difficult sample matrices.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fate and transport of viableJournal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995) · 2024Article
- Evaluation of sponge wipe surface sampling for collection of potential surrogates for non-spore-forming bioterrorism agents.Journal of applied microbiology · 2024Article
- Monitoring spore washoff during a biological contamination incident response using automated stormwater samplers and sensors to predict contamination movement.The Science of the total environment · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Large area sampling approaches have been developed and implemented by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to increase sample sizes, and potentially representativeness, in outdoor urban environments (e.g., concrete, asphalt, grass/landscaping). These sampling approaches could be implemented in response to an outdoor biological contamination incident or bioterrorism attack to determine the extent of contamination and for clearance following remediation. However, sample collection over large areas often contains an extensive amount of co-collected debris and native background microorganisms that interfere with the detection of biological threat agents. Sample processing methods that utilize basic laboratory equipment amenable to field deployment were selected and applied to turbid aqueous samples (TAS) to reduce particulates and native environmental organisms prior to culture and rapid viability-polymerase chain reaction (RV-PCR) analytical methods. Bacillus anthracis Sterne (BaS) spores were spiked into TAS collected by soil grab, wet vacuum collection from an outdoor concrete surface, or storm water runoff from an urban parking lot. The implementation of a sample processing method improved the sensitivity of culture and RV-PCR analytical methods for BaS spore detection in soil and wet vacuum TAS samples compared to baseline (minimal to no field processing methods applied). For soil, when the processing method was applied, samples with 15 colony forming units (CFU)/ml (60 CFU/g) and 1.5 CFU/mL (6 CFU/g) BaS spore load were detected using culture and RV-PCR, respectively. Most notably, the processing methods greatly improved the sensitivity of the RV-PCR analytical method for the wet vacuum TAS from no detection at the 1500 CFU/mL BaS spore load level to as low as 1.5 CFU/mL BaS spore load.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.