Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36104615›Full record

ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2022

Reasons for Knocking at an Empty House: Visualisation, Representation and Dissemination of Health-Related Public Engagement Media.

Ed Young, Anastasia Koch

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 63% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ed YoungEh!woza, Cape Town, South Africa. ed@ehwoza.com.
Anastasia KochEh!woza, Cape Town, South Africa.
South African Medical Research Council · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stigma and mistrust generate significant barriers to the uptake of biomedical, clinical and public health measures to combat infectious diseases. Many pandemics such as HIV, TB and COVID-19 disproportionately affect poorer communities, and the social and public health impact is connected through socio-political histories and contexts. This chapter describes activities and reflections of a South African public engagement programme, Eh!woza, that aims to bring together the biomedicine of disease with its social context and impact. We describe experiences working on tuberculosis-related public engagement programmes in South Africa, and how these approaches were refocused to address the COVID-19 pandemic. We reflect on the lesson learned and considerations around visualising the social impact of disease and making the visualisation of accurate information relatable to younger audiences. Much of the discussion is situated within description and reflection, touching on both the historical and contemporary cultural and political conditions in which infectious diseases have flourished. Finally, the challenges we faced when effectively disseminating media on large-scale digital platforms are highlighted, raising important questions around representation, mass targets, and impactful dissemination of public engagement outputs.

Indexed as

COVID-19TuberculosisHumansPandemicsPublic HealthSocial StigmaDisseminationHealth-seeking behaviourPublic engagementSocial determinants of healthStigma

Identifiers

PMID36104615
OpenAlexW4295792996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.