Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36104612›Full record

ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2023

High-density electroanatomic mapping with grid catheter in pediatrics and congenital heart disease.

Johannes C von Alvensleben, Amneet Sandhu, Shu Chang, D Martin Runciman, Melissa Wehrmann, D Wendy Tzou, Michal Schäfer, Kathryn K Collins

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Johannes C von AlvenslebenChildren's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 13123 East 16th Ave, B100, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. Johannes.vonalvensleben@childrenscolorado.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7700-0733
Amneet SandhuUniversity of Colorado Hospital, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Shu ChangUniversity of Colorado Hospital, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
D Martin RuncimanChildren's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 13123 East 16th Ave, B100, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Melissa WehrmannChildren's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 13123 East 16th Ave, B100, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
D Wendy TzouUniversity of Colorado Hospital, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Michal SchäferChildren's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 13123 East 16th Ave, B100, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Kathryn K CollinsChildren's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 13123 East 16th Ave, B100, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Children's Hospital Colorado · USUniversity of Colorado Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Advisor™ HD Grid mapping catheter (Abbott Laboratories; Chicago, IL) allows for bipolar electrogram collection in both orthogonal and perpendicular planes, unique when compared to traditional and branch catheters. Experience in pediatric patients and congenital heart disease (CHD) is limited. The purpose of this work was to evaluate the utility and safety of the Advisor™ HD Grid mapping catheter in pediatric and CHD populations.

methodsRetrospective review of all pediatric patients and those with CHD (regardless of age) at Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado undergoing electrophysiologic study in which the Advisor™ HD Grid mapping catheter was utilized.

resultsSixty-five procedures in 60 patients (N = 31 female (47.6%), median age 17 years (15-24.1)) were included. Patients had CHD in 30 procedures (46.1%). Eight-eight arrhythmia substrates were mapped including atrial flutter/intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia (N = 33), focal atrial tachycardia (N = 20), isolated PVCs (N = 10), accessory pathways (N = 9), atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (N = 7), right ventricular substrate mapping (N = 7), and ventricular tachycardia (N = 2). Median time per map was 11.8 (7.5-20.1) min with 3.2 (± 1.7) maps per procedure and a median of 2634 (1767-7654) points used per map. Patients with CHD required more maps (p < 0.001) and points per map (p < 0.001). Ablation was successful in 92.4% of procedures.

conclusionsThe Advisor™ HD Grid mapping catheter is safe and effective in the pediatric and congenital heart disease population. A wide variety of arrhythmia substrates can be mapped with high point density and low mapping time.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationHeart Defects, CongenitalTachycardia, SupraventricularTachycardia, VentricularVentricular Premature ComplexesAdolescentCathetersChildFemaleHumansTreatment OutcomeAblationAdult congenital heart diseaseCongenital heart diseaseElectroanatomic mappingPediatric

Identifiers

PMID36104612
OpenAlexW4295749235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.