Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36104562›Full record

ArticleNature2022

Living material assembly of bacteriogenic protocells.

Can Xu, Nicolas Martin, Mei Li, Stephen Mann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Sequence-Modulated Active Tripeptide Condensates for Tandem Catalysis.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
  12. Dynamic Covalent Boronate Chemistry forJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Competitive MgJACS Au · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Artificial cells with liquid-liquid phase separation-regulated cell-free protein synthesis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Can XuCentre for Protolife Research and Centre for Organized Matter Chemistry, School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Nicolas MartinUniv. Bordeaux, CNRS, Centre de Recherche Paul Pascal, UMR5031, Pessac, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1367-4330
Mei LiCentre for Protolife Research and Centre for Organized Matter Chemistry, School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. mei.li@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7105-6632
Stephen MannCentre for Protolife Research and Centre for Organized Matter Chemistry, School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. s.mann@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3012-8964

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancing the spontaneous bottom-up construction of artificial cells with high organizational complexity and diverse functionality remains an unresolved issue at the interface between living and non-living matter

Indexed as

Artificial CellsEscherichia coliMicrobial ViabilitySynthetic BiologyActin CytoskeletonActinsAdenosine TriphosphateBiotechnologyHistonesVacuolesWaterActinsAdenosine TriphosphateHistonesWater

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.