Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36104560›Full record

ArticleNature2022

Distinguishing externally from saccade-induced motion in visual cortex.

Satoru K Miura, Massimo Scanziani

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Ecological Visual Processing in the Mouse.Annual review of neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Active gaze behavior organizes V1 activity in freely-moving marmosets.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Inter- and intrahemispheric sources of vestibular signals to V1.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Pre-microsaccadic Modulation in Foveal V1: Enhancement in the Current and Future Stimulus Locations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  16. Diverse and dynamic influences of saccades on visual representations in the mouse superior colliculus.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Satoru K MiuraCenter for Neural Circuits and Behavior, Neurobiology Section and Department of Neuroscience, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. smiura@ucla.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6698-9435
Massimo ScanzianiCenter for Neural Circuits and Behavior, Neurobiology Section and Department of Neuroscience, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. massimo@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5331-9686
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

Validating Theoretical Models with Neurophysiology and OptogeneticsU19NS107613 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ADESNIK, HILLEL · 2018 to 2022
$16.7M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNINDS NIH HHS U19 NS107613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distinguishing sensory stimuli caused by changes in the environment from those caused by an animal's own actions is a hallmark of sensory processing

Indexed as

MovementSaccadesVisual CortexAnimalsMicePhotic StimulationRetinaThalamic Nuclei

Identifiers

PMID36104560
PMCPMC9534749
OpenAlexW4295763140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.