Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36104468›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI physics2022

Motion correction and its impact on quantification in dynamic total-body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET.

Tao Sun, Yaping Wu, Wei Wei, Fangfang Fu, Nan Meng, Hongzhao Chen, Xiaochen Li, Yan Bai, Zhenguo Wang, Jie Ding and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Utilizing temporal information to assess metabolic heterogeneity: a study ofQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025
    Article
  9. Total-Body Parametric Imaging Using Relative Patlak Plot.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  10. EJNMMI physics · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Determining the optimal pharmacokinetic modelling and simplified quantification method of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Extracting value from total-body PET/CT image data - the emerging role of artificial intelligence.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Review
  17. Beyond stillness: the importance of tackling patient's motion for reliable parametric imaging.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Impact of patient motion on parametric PET imaging.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tao SunPaul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6734-6837
Yaping WuHenan Provincial People's Hospital and the People's Hospital of Zhengzhou, University of Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Wei WeiHenan Provincial People's Hospital and the People's Hospital of Zhengzhou, University of Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Fangfang FuHenan Provincial People's Hospital and the People's Hospital of Zhengzhou, University of Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Nan MengHenan Provincial People's Hospital and the People's Hospital of Zhengzhou, University of Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Hongzhao ChenPaul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Xiaochen LiHenan Provincial People's Hospital and the People's Hospital of Zhengzhou, University of Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yan BaiHenan Provincial People's Hospital and the People's Hospital of Zhengzhou, University of Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Zhenguo WangPaul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Jie DingPaul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Debin HuCentral Research Institute, United Imaging Healthcare Group Co., Ltd, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Chaojie ChenCentral Research Institute, United Imaging Healthcare Group Co., Ltd, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Zhanli HuPaul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Dong LiangPaul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Xin LiuPaul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Hairong ZhengPaul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Yongfeng YangPaul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Yun ZhouCentral Research Institute, United Imaging Healthcare Group Co., Ltd, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Meiyun WangHenan Provincial People's Hospital and the People's Hospital of Zhengzhou, University of Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China. mywang@ha.edu.cn.
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNZhengzhou University · CNUnited Imaging Healthcare (China) · CNShanghaiTech University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe total-body positron emission tomography (PET) scanner provides an unprecedented opportunity to scan the whole body simultaneously, thanks to its long axial field of view and ultrahigh temporal resolution. To fully utilize this potential in clinical settings, a dynamic scan would be necessary to obtain the desired kinetic information from scan data. However, in a long dynamic acquisition, patient movement can degrade image quality and quantification accuracy.

methodsIn this work, we demonstrated a motion correction framework and its importance in dynamic total-body FDG PET imaging. Dynamic FDG scans from 12 subjects acquired on a uEXPLORER PET/CT were included. In these subjects, 7 are healthy subjects and 5 are those with tumors in the thorax and abdomen. All scans were contaminated by motion to some degree, and for each the list-mode data were reconstructed into 1-min frames. The dynamic frames were aligned to a reference position by sequentially registering each frame to its previous neighboring frame. We parametrized the motion fields in-between frames as diffeomorphism, which can map the shape change of the object smoothly and continuously in time and space. Diffeomorphic representations of motion fields were derived by registering neighboring frames using large deformation diffeomorphic metric matching. When all pairwise registrations were completed, the motion field at each frame was obtained by concatenating the successive motion fields and transforming that frame into the reference position. The proposed correction method was labeled SyN-seq. The method that was performed similarly, but aligned each frame to a designated middle frame, was labeled as SyN-mid. Instead of SyN, the method that performed the sequential affine registration was labeled as Aff-seq. The original uncorrected images were labeled as NMC. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed to compare the performance of the proposed method with that of other correction methods and uncorrected images.

resultsThe results indicated that visual improvement was achieved after correction of the SUV images for the motion present period, especially in the brain and abdomen. For subjects with tumors, the average improvement in tumor SUVmean was 5.35 ± 4.92% (P = 0.047), with a maximum improvement of 12.89%. An overall quality improvement in quantitative K

conclusionTo conclude, motion correction is important for image quality in dynamic total-body PET imaging. We demonstrated a correction framework that can effectively reduce the effect of random body movements on dynamic images and their associated quantification. The proposed correction framework can potentially benefit applications that require total-body assessment, such as imaging the brain-gut axis and systemic diseases.

Indexed as

Dynamic imagingKinetic modelingMotion correctionTotal-body PET

Identifiers

PMID36104468
PMCPMC9474756
OpenAlexW4295700856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.