Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36104455›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2023

Paclitaxel drug-coated balloon-only angioplasty for de novo coronary artery disease in elective clinical practice.

Ioannis Merinopoulos, Tharusha Gunawardena, Natasha Corballis, U Bhalraam, Tim Gilbert, Clint Maart, Paul Richardson, Alisdair Ryding, Toomas Sarev, Chris Sawh and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. A Comparison of a Drug Coated Balloon With Drug Eluting Stent Strategy for Treating Coronary Bifurcation Lesions.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Validation of complex PCI criteria in drug-coated balloon angioplasty.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2025
    Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Drug-Coated Balloons for Coronary Interventions: A Focused Review.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2025
    Review
  13. Safety aspects ofFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ioannis MerinopoulosDepartment of Cardiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2059-0357
Tharusha GunawardenaDepartment of Cardiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.
Natasha CorballisDepartment of Cardiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.
U BhalraamDivision of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Tim GilbertDepartment of Cardiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.
Clint MaartDepartment of Cardiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.
Paul RichardsonDepartment of Cardiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.
Alisdair RydingDepartment of Cardiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.
Toomas SarevDepartment of Cardiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.
Chris SawhDepartment of Cardiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.
Sreekumar SulfiDepartment of Cardiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.
Upul WickramarachchiDepartment of Cardiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.
Trevor WistowDepartment of Cardiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.
Mohamed O MohamedUniversity of Keele, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
Mamas A MamasUniversity of Keele, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
Vassilios S Vassiliou *Department of Cardiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK. v.vassiliou@uea.ac.uk.
Simon C Eccleshall *Department of Cardiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GBKeele University · GBUniversity of Dundee · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe aimed to investigate the safety of drug-coated balloon (DCB)-only angioplasty compared to drug-eluting stent (DES), as part of routine clinical practice.

backgroundThe recent BASKETSMALL2 trial demonstrated the safety and efficacy of DCB angioplasty for de novo small vessel disease. Registry data have also demonstrated that DCB angioplasty is safe; however, most of these studies are limited due to long recruitment time and a small number of patients with DCB compared to DES. Therefore, it is unclear if DCB-only strategy is safe to incorporate in routine elective clinical practice.

methodsWe compared all-cause mortality and major cardiovascular endpoints (MACE), including unplanned target lesion revascularisation (TLR) of all patients treated with DCB or DES for first presentation of stable angina due to de novo coronary artery disease between 1st January 2015 and 15th November 2019. Data were analysed with Cox regression models and cumulative hazard plots.

resultsWe present 1237 patients; 544 treated with DCB and 693 treated with DES for de novo, mainly large-vessel coronary artery disease. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, only age and frailty remained significant adverse predictors of all-cause mortality. Univariable, cumulative hazard plots showed no difference between DCB and DES for either all-cause mortality or any of the major cardiovascular endpoints, including unplanned TLR. The results remained unchanged following propensity score-matched analysis.

conclusionDCB-only angioplasty, for stable angina and predominantly large vessels, is safe compared to DES as part of routine clinical practice, in terms of all-cause mortality and MACE, including unplanned TLR.

Indexed as

Angina, StableAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary RestenosisDrug-Eluting StentsCoated Materials, BiocompatibleHumansPaclitaxelTreatment OutcomeCoated Materials, BiocompatiblePaclitaxelDe novo diseaseDrug-coated balloonStable angina

Identifiers

PMID36104455
PMCPMC10449668
OpenAlexW4295781835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.