Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36104390›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Selection in a growing colony biases results of mutation accumulation experiments.

Anjali Mahilkar, Namratha Raj, Sharvari Kemkar, Supreet Saini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Extended sequence context shapes mutational bias inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A fitness trade-off explains the early fate of yeast aneuploids with chromosome gains.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anjali MahilkarDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai, 400076, India.
Namratha RajDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai, 400076, India.
Sharvari KemkarDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai, 400076, India.
Supreet SainiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai, 400076, India. saini@che.iitb.ac.in.

Funding

DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/S/19/2/504632Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutations provide the raw material for natural selection to act. Therefore, understanding the variety and relative frequency of different type of mutations is critical to understanding the nature of genetic diversity in a population. Mutation accumulation (MA) experiments have been used in this context to estimate parameters defining mutation rates, distribution of fitness effects (DFE), and spectrum of mutations. MA experiments can be performed with different effective population sizes. In MA experiments with bacteria, a single founder is grown to a size of a colony (~ 10

Indexed as

Genetic FitnessMutation AccumulationBiasEscherichia coliMutation Rate

Identifiers

PMID36104390
PMCPMC9475022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.