Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36104365›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Layered feedback control overcomes performance trade-off in synthetic biomolecular networks.

Chelsea Y Hu, Richard M Murray

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Programming Next-Generation Synthetic Biosensors by Genetic Circuit Design.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Feedback Control and Sensitivity Analysis in Synthetic Gene Circuits.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chelsea Y HuDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA. chelsea.hu@tamu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2211-1778
Richard M MurrayDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5785-7481
California Institute of Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Layered feedback is an optimization strategy in feedback control designs widely used in engineering. Control theory suggests that layering multiple feedbacks could overcome the robustness-speed performance trade-off limit. In natural biological networks, genes are often regulated in layers to adapt to environmental perturbations. It is hypothesized layering architecture could also overcome the robustness-speed performance trade-off in genetic networks. In this work, we validate this hypothesis with a synthetic biomolecular network in living E. coli cells. We start with system dynamics analysis using models of various complexities to guide the design of a layered control architecture in living cells. Experimentally, we interrogate system dynamics under three groups of perturbations. We consistently observe that the layered control improves system performance in the robustness-speed domain. This work confirms that layered control could be adopted in synthetic biomolecular networks for performance optimization. It also provides insights into understanding genetic feedback control architectures in nature.

Indexed as

Escherichia coliFeedback, PhysiologicalAdaptation, PhysiologicalFeedbackGene Regulatory Networks

Identifiers

PMID36104365
PMCPMC9474519
OpenAlexW4295900761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.