Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36104357›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Effects of biological sex mismatch on neural progenitor cell transplantation for spinal cord injury in mice.

Michael Pitonak, Miriam Aceves, Prakruthi Amar Kumar, Gabrielle Dampf, Peyton Green, Ashley Tucker, Valerie Dietz, Diego Miranda, Sunjay Letchuman, Michelle M Jonika and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. "Time Is Brain" - for Cell Therapies.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Wrap it up: myelination of transplanted neurons for repair.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael PitonakDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Miriam AcevesDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Prakruthi Amar KumarDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6008-2018
Gabrielle DampfDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7932-4504
Peyton GreenGanado High School, Ganado, TX, 77962, USA.
Ashley TuckerDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Valerie DietzDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Diego MirandaDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Sunjay LetchumanDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5535-7910
Michelle M JonikaDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1170-6418
David BautistaDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Heath BlackmonDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5433-4036
Jennifer N DulinDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA. jdulin@bio.tamu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5767-4290
Texas A&M University · US

Funding

Dissecting Connectivity and Function of Transplanted Interneurons in the Injured Spinal CordR01NS116404 · NINDS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI DULIN, JENNIFER N · 2021 to 2025
$1.8M
Integrating theory, genomics, and comparative approaches to break barriers to the understanding of genome structure and sex chromosome evolution.R35GM138098 · NIGMS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI BLACKMON, HEATH · 2020 to 2024
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM138098NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS116404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite advancement of neural progenitor cell transplantation to spinal cord injury clinical trials, there remains a lack of understanding of how biological sex of transplanted cells influences outcomes after transplantation. To address this, we transplanted GFP-expressing sex-matched, sex-mismatched, or mixed donor cells into sites of spinal cord injury in adult male and female mice. Biological sex of the donor cells does not influence graft neuron density, glial differentiation, formation of the reactive glial cell border, or graft axon outgrowth. However, male grafts in female hosts feature extensive hypervascularization accompanied by increased vascular diameter and perivascular cell density. We show greater T-cell infiltration within male-to-female grafts than other graft types. Together, these findings indicate a biological sex-specific immune response of female mice to male donor cells. Our work suggests that biological sex should be considered in the design of future clinical trials for cell transplantation in human injury.

Indexed as

Neural Stem CellsSpinal Cord InjuriesAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleMiceNeurogliaNeuronsStem Cell Transplantation

Identifiers

PMID36104357
PMCPMC9474813
OpenAlexW4295899947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.